Java基础回顾之数组相关
2018-05-07 本文已影响0人
Pasonx
学习Java那么久了，但是很多知识点掌握的仍不够牢固不够扎实，故特此写一系列博客来总结，希望有所提高。
Java中的数组
一维数组定义的三种方法：
int[] arr = new int[3];
int[] arr = new int[]{1,2,3};
int[] arr = {1,2,3};
PS：如果没有初始化，Java会给数组默认值，如int默认为0，引用类型默认为null
二维数组
Java语言中，由于把二维数组看作是数组的数组，数组空间不是连续分配的，所以不要求二维数组每一维的大小相同，例子如下：
int intArray[][] = {{1,2},{2,3},{3,4,5}};
动态初始化：
1 ) 直接为每一维分配空间，格式如下：
type arrayName = new type[arrayLength1][arrayLength2];
int[][] arr = new int[2][3];
2 ) 从最高维开始，分别为每一维分配空间：
int[][] arr = new int[3][];
arr[0] = new int[10];
arr[1] = new int[12];
arr[2] = new int[10];
int[][] arr = new int[][];
arr = new int[LENGTH_1][];
for (int i = 0;i < arr.lenth;i ++) {
arr[i] = new int[LENGTH_2];
}
//对二维复合数据类型的数组，必须首先为最高维分配引用空间
//然后再顺次为低维分配空间。而且，必须为每个数组元素单独分配空间。例如：
String s[ ][ ] = new String[2][ ];
s[0]= new String[2];//为最高维分配引用空间
s[1]= new String[2]; //为最高维分配引用空间
s[0][0]= new String("Good");// 为每个数组元素单独分配空间
s[0][1]= new String("Luck");// 为每个数组元素单独分配空间
s[1][0]= new String("to");// 为每个数组元素单独分配空间
s[1][1]= new String("You");// 为每个数组元素单独分配空间
System.arraycopy() && Arrays.copyOf()
首先看看System.arraycopy() 的声明
public static native void arraycopy(Object src, int srcPos,Object dest,
int destPos, int length);
可以看到这个是一个本地 方法，调用了底层操作系统的代码，效率自然会很高
再来看Arrays.copyOf()
public static <T,U> T[] copyOf(U[] original, int newLength, Class<? extends T[]> newType) {
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
T[] copy = ((Object)newType == (Object)Object[].class)
? (T[]) new Object[newLength]
: (T[]) Array.newInstance(newType.getComponentType(), newLength);
System.arraycopy(original, 0, copy, 0,
Math.min(original.length, newLength));
return copy;
}
我们发现Arrays.copyOf方法也是调用了System.arraycopy()方法
区别在于：
arraycopy()需要目标数组，将原数组拷贝到你自己定义的数组里，而且可以选择拷贝的起点和长度以及放入新数组中的位置
copyOf()是系统自动在内部新建一个数组，调用arraycopy()将original内容复制到copy中去，并且长度为newLength。返回copy; 即将原数组拷贝到一个长度为newLength的新数组中，并返回该数组。
总结
Array.copyOf()可以看作是受限的System.arraycopy()，它主要是用来将原数组全部拷贝到一个新长度的数组，适用于数组扩容。
Arrays.sort()
我们使用sort()对数组进行排序是很方便的，然而Java源码的实现并不简单，我们来看看Java源码， 会发现源码里不仅仅是简单的使用了一种排序算法，而是涉及到了快速排序，归并排序，插入排序等多种排序，并且还考虑了数组是否已经基本有序，数组结构化程度，数组规模等因素，做了大量的优化。
static void sort(int[] a, int left, int right,
int[] work, int workBase, int workLen) {
// Use Quicksort on small arrays
if (right - left < QUICKSORT_THRESHOLD) {
sort(a, left, right, true);
return;
}
/*
* Index run[i] is the start of i-th run
* (ascending or descending sequence).
*/
int[] run = new int[MAX_RUN_COUNT + 1];
int count = 0; run[0] = left;
// Check if the array is nearly sorted
for (int k = left; k < right; run[count] = k) {
if (a[k] < a[k + 1]) { // ascending
while (++k <= right && a[k - 1] <= a[k]);
} else if (a[k] > a[k + 1]) { // descending
while (++k <= right && a[k - 1] >= a[k]);
for (int lo = run[count] - 1, hi = k; ++lo < --hi; ) {
int t = a[lo]; a[lo] = a[hi]; a[hi] = t;
}
} else { // equal
for (int m = MAX_RUN_LENGTH; ++k <= right && a[k - 1] == a[k]; ) {
if (--m == 0) {
sort(a, left, right, true);
return;
}
}
}
/*
* The array is not highly structured,
* use Quicksort instead of merge sort.
*/
if (++count == MAX_RUN_COUNT) {
sort(a, left, right, true);
return;
}
}
// Check special cases
// Implementation note: variable "right" is increased by 1.
if (run[count] == right++) { // The last run contains one element
run[++count] = right;
} else if (count == 1) { // The array is already sorted
return;
}
// Determine alternation base for merge
byte odd = 0;
for (int n = 1; (n <<= 1) < count; odd ^= 1);
// Use or create temporary array b for merging
int[] b; // temp array; alternates with a
int ao, bo; // array offsets from 'left'
int blen = right - left; // space needed for b
if (work == null || workLen < blen || workBase + blen > work.length) {
work = new int[blen];
workBase = 0;
}
if (odd == 0) {
System.arraycopy(a, left, work, workBase, blen);
b = a;
bo = 0;
a = work;
ao = workBase - left;
} else {
b = work;
ao = 0;
bo = workBase - left;
}
// Merging
for (int last; count > 1; count = last) {
for (int k = (last = 0) + 2; k <= count; k += 2) {
int hi = run[k], mi = run[k - 1];
for (int i = run[k - 2], p = i, q = mi; i < hi; ++i) {
if (q >= hi || p < mi && a[p + ao] <= a[q + ao]) {
b[i + bo] = a[p++ + ao];
} else {
b[i + bo] = a[q++ + ao];
}
}
run[++last] = hi;
}
if ((count & 1) != 0) {
for (int i = right, lo = run[count - 1]; --i >= lo;
b[i + bo] = a[i + ao]
);
run[++last] = right;
}
int[] t = a; a = b; b = t;
int o = ao; ao = bo; bo = o;
}
}
private static void sort(int[] a, int left, int right, boolean leftmost) {
int length = right - left + 1;
// Use insertion sort on tiny arrays
if (length < INSERTION_SORT_THRESHOLD) {
if (leftmost) {
/*
* Traditional (without sentinel) insertion sort,
* optimized for server VM, is used in case of
* the leftmost part.
*/
for (int i = left, j = i; i < right; j = ++i) {
int ai = a[i + 1];
while (ai < a[j]) {
a[j + 1] = a[j];
if (j-- == left) {
break;
}
}
a[j + 1] = ai;
}
} else {
/*
* Skip the longest ascending sequence.
*/
do {
if (left >= right) {
return;
}
} while (a[++left] >= a[left - 1]);
/*
* Every element from adjoining part plays the role
* of sentinel, therefore this allows us to avoid the
* left range check on each iteration. Moreover, we use
* the more optimized algorithm, so called pair insertion
* sort, which is faster (in the context of Quicksort)
* than traditional implementation of insertion sort.
*/
for (int k = left; ++left <= right; k = ++left) {
int a1 = a[k], a2 = a[left];
if (a1 < a2) {
a2 = a1; a1 = a[left];
}
while (a1 < a[--k]) {
a[k + 2] = a[k];
}
a[++k + 1] = a1;
while (a2 < a[--k]) {
a[k + 1] = a[k];
}
a[k + 1] = a2;
}
int last = a[right];
while (last < a[--right]) {
a[right + 1] = a[right];
}
a[right + 1] = last;
}
return;
}
// Inexpensive approximation of length / 7
int seventh = (length >> 3) + (length >> 6) + 1;
/*
* Sort five evenly spaced elements around (and including) the
* center element in the range. These elements will be used for
* pivot selection as described below. The choice for spacing
* these elements was empirically determined to work well on
* a wide variety of inputs.
*/
int e3 = (left + right) >>> 1; // The midpoint
int e2 = e3 - seventh;
int e1 = e2 - seventh;
int e4 = e3 + seventh;
int e5 = e4 + seventh;
// Sort these elements using insertion sort
if (a[e2] < a[e1]) { int t = a[e2]; a[e2] = a[e1]; a[e1] = t; }
if (a[e3] < a[e2]) { int t = a[e3]; a[e3] = a[e2]; a[e2] = t;
if (t < a[e1]) { a[e2] = a[e1]; a[e1] = t; }
}
if (a[e4] < a[e3]) { int t = a[e4]; a[e4] = a[e3]; a[e3] = t;
if (t < a[e2]) { a[e3] = a[e2]; a[e2] = t;
if (t < a[e1]) { a[e2] = a[e1]; a[e1] = t; }
}
}
if (a[e5] < a[e4]) { int t = a[e5]; a[e5] = a[e4]; a[e4] = t;
if (t < a[e3]) { a[e4] = a[e3]; a[e3] = t;
if (t < a[e2]) { a[e3] = a[e2]; a[e2] = t;
if (t < a[e1]) { a[e2] = a[e1]; a[e1] = t; }
}
}
}
// Pointers
int less = left; // The index of the first element of center part
int great = right; // The index before the first element of right part
if (a[e1] != a[e2] && a[e2] != a[e3] && a[e3] != a[e4] && a[e4] != a[e5]) {
/*
* Use the second and fourth of the five sorted elements as pivots.
* These values are inexpensive approximations of the first and
* second terciles of the array. Note that pivot1 <= pivot2.
*/
int pivot1 = a[e2];
int pivot2 = a[e4];
/*
* The first and the last elements to be sorted are moved to the
* locations formerly occupied by the pivots. When partitioning
* is complete, the pivots are swapped back into their final
* positions, and excluded from subsequent sorting.
*/
a[e2] = a[left];
a[e4] = a[right];
/*
* Skip elements, which are less or greater than pivot values.
*/
while (a[++less] < pivot1);
while (a[--great] > pivot2);
/*
* Partitioning:
*
* left part center part right part
* +--------------------------------------------------------------+
* | < pivot1 | pivot1 <= && <= pivot2 | ? | > pivot2 |
* +--------------------------------------------------------------+
* ^ ^ ^
* | | |
* less k great
*
* Invariants:
*
* all in (left, less) < pivot1
* pivot1 <= all in [less, k) <= pivot2
* all in (great, right) > pivot2
*
* Pointer k is the first index of ?-part.
*/
outer:
for (int k = less - 1; ++k <= great; ) {
int ak = a[k];
if (ak < pivot1) { // Move a[k] to left part
a[k] = a[less];
/*
* Here and below we use "a[i] = b; i++;" instead
* of "a[i++] = b;" due to performance issue.
*/
a[less] = ak;
++less;
} else if (ak > pivot2) { // Move a[k] to right part
while (a[great] > pivot2) {
if (great-- == k) {
break outer;
}
}
if (a[great] < pivot1) { // a[great] <= pivot2
a[k] = a[less];
a[less] = a[great];
++less;
} else { // pivot1 <= a[great] <= pivot2
a[k] = a[great];
}
/*
* Here and below we use "a[i] = b; i--;" instead
* of "a[i--] = b;" due to performance issue.
*/
a[great] = ak;
--great;
}
}
// Swap pivots into their final positions
a[left] = a[less - 1]; a[less - 1] = pivot1;
a[right] = a[great + 1]; a[great + 1] = pivot2;
// Sort left and right parts recursively, excluding known pivots
sort(a, left, less - 2, leftmost);
sort(a, great + 2, right, false);
/*
* If center part is too large (comprises > 4/7 of the array),
* swap internal pivot values to ends.
*/
if (less < e1 && e5 < great) {
/*
* Skip elements, which are equal to pivot values.
*/
while (a[less] == pivot1) {
++less;
}
while (a[great] == pivot2) {
--great;
}
/*
* Partitioning:
*
* left part center part right part
* +----------------------------------------------------------+
* | == pivot1 | pivot1 < && < pivot2 | ? | == pivot2 |
* +----------------------------------------------------------+
* ^ ^ ^
* | | |
* less k great
*
* Invariants:
*
* all in (*, less) == pivot1
* pivot1 < all in [less, k) < pivot2
* all in (great, *) == pivot2
*
* Pointer k is the first index of ?-part.
*/
outer:
for (int k = less - 1; ++k <= great; ) {
int ak = a[k];
if (ak == pivot1) { // Move a[k] to left part
a[k] = a[less];
a[less] = ak;
++less;
} else if (ak == pivot2) { // Move a[k] to right part
while (a[great] == pivot2) {
if (great-- == k) {
break outer;
}
}
if (a[great] == pivot1) { // a[great] < pivot2
a[k] = a[less];
/*
* Even though a[great] equals to pivot1, the
* assignment a[less] = pivot1 may be incorrect,
* if a[great] and pivot1 are floating-point zeros
* of different signs. Therefore in float and
* double sorting methods we have to use more
* accurate assignment a[less] = a[great].
*/
a[less] = pivot1;
++less;
} else { // pivot1 < a[great] < pivot2
a[k] = a[great];
}
a[great] = ak;
--great;
}
}
}
// Sort center part recursively
sort(a, less, great, false);
} else { // Partitioning with one pivot
/*
* Use the third of the five sorted elements as pivot.
* This value is inexpensive approximation of the median.
*/
int pivot = a[e3];
/*
* Partitioning degenerates to the traditional 3-way
* (or "Dutch National Flag") schema:
*
* left part center part right part
* +-------------------------------------------------+
* | < pivot | == pivot | ? | > pivot |
* +-------------------------------------------------+
* ^ ^ ^
* | | |
* less k great
*
* Invariants:
*
* all in (left, less) < pivot
* all in [less, k) == pivot
* all in (great, right) > pivot
*
* Pointer k is the first index of ?-part.
*/
for (int k = less; k <= great; ++k) {
if (a[k] == pivot) {
continue;
}
int ak = a[k];
if (ak < pivot) { // Move a[k] to left part
a[k] = a[less];
a[less] = ak;
++less;
} else { // a[k] > pivot - Move a[k] to right part
while (a[great] > pivot) {
--great;
}
if (a[great] < pivot) { // a[great] <= pivot
a[k] = a[less];
a[less] = a[great];
++less;
} else { // a[great] == pivot
/*
* Even though a[great] equals to pivot, the
* assignment a[k] = pivot may be incorrect,
* if a[great] and pivot are floating-point
* zeros of different signs. Therefore in float
* and double sorting methods we have to use
* more accurate assignment a[k] = a[great].
*/
a[k] = pivot;
}
a[great] = ak;
--great;
}
}
/*
* Sort left and right parts recursively.
* All elements from center part are equal
* and, therefore, already sorted.
*/
sort(a, left, less - 1, leftmost);
sort(a, great + 1, right, false);
}
}
