RecyclerView缓存机制（复用）
2019-02-15 本文已影响4人
唐子玄
这是RecyclerView缓存机制系列文章的第一篇。
引子
- 如果列表中每个移出屏幕的表项都直接销毁，移入时重新创建，很不经济。所以RecyclerView引入了缓存机制。
- 回收是为了复用，复用的好处是有可能免去两个昂贵的操作：1. 为表项视图绑定数据 2. 创建表项视图
- 下面几个问题对于理解“回收复用机制”很关键：
- what：回收什么？复用什么？
- where：回收到哪里去？从哪里获得复用？
- when：什么时候回收？什么时候复用？
这一篇试着从已知的知识出发在源码中寻觅未知的“RecyclerView复用机制”。
(ps: 下文中的 粗斜体字 表示引导源码阅读的内心戏)
寻觅
触发复用的众多时机中必然包含下面这种：“当移出屏幕的表项重新回到界面”。表项本质上是一个View，屏幕上的表项必然需要依附于一棵View树，即必然有一个父容器调用了addView()。而 RecyclerView继承自 ViewGroup，遂以RecyclerView.addView()为切入点向上搜寻复用的代码。
在RecyclerView.java中全局搜索“addView”，发现RecyclerView()并没有对addView()函数重载，但找到一处addView()的调用：
//RecyclerView是ViewGroup的子类
public class RecyclerView extends ViewGroup implements ScrollingView, NestedScrollingChild2 {
...
private void initChildrenHelper() {
mChildHelper = new ChildHelper(new ChildHelper.Callback() {
...
@Override
public void addView(View child, int index) {
if (VERBOSE_TRACING) {
TraceCompat.beginSection("RV addView");
}
//直接调用ViewGroup.addView()
RecyclerView.this.addView(child, index);
if (VERBOSE_TRACING) {
TraceCompat.endSection();
}
dispatchChildAttached(child);
}
}
}
...
}
以ChildHelper.Callback.addView()为起点沿着调用链继续向上搜寻，经历ChildHelper.addView()---LayoutManager.addViewInt()---LayoutManager.addView()最终到达LayoutManager.layoutChunk()：
void layoutChunk(RecyclerView.Recycler recycler, RecyclerView.State state,LayoutState layoutState, LayoutChunkResult result) {
//获得下一个表项
View view = layoutState.next(recycler);
if (view == null) {
if (DEBUG && layoutState.mScrapList == null) {
throw new RuntimeException("received null view when unexpected");
}
// if we are laying out views in scrap, this may return null which means there is
// no more items to layout.
result.mFinished = true;
return;
}
LayoutParams params = (LayoutParams) view.getLayoutParams();
if (layoutState.mScrapList == null) {
//将表项插入到列表中
if (mShouldReverseLayout == (layoutState.mLayoutDirection
== LayoutState.LAYOUT_START)) {
addView(view);
} else {
addView(view, 0);
}
} else {
if (mShouldReverseLayout == (layoutState.mLayoutDirection
== LayoutState.LAYOUT_START)) {
addDisappearingView(view);
} else {
addDisappearingView(view, 0);
}
}
...
}
addView(view)中传入的view是函数layoutState.next()的返回值。猜测该函数是用来获得下一个表项的。表项不止一个，应该有一个循环不断的获得下一个表项才对。沿着刚才的调用链继续往上搜寻，就会发现：的确有一个循环！
public class LinearLayoutManager extends RecyclerView.LayoutManager implements ItemTouchHelper.ViewDropHandler, RecyclerView.SmoothScroller.ScrollVectorProvider {
...
int fill(RecyclerView.Recycler recycler, LayoutState layoutState,
RecyclerView.State state, boolean stopOnFocusable) {
...
//recyclerview 剩余空间
int remainingSpace = layoutState.mAvailable + layoutState.mExtra;
LayoutChunkResult layoutChunkResult = mLayoutChunkResult;
//不断填充，直到空间消耗完毕
while ((layoutState.mInfinite || remainingSpace > 0) && layoutState.hasMore(state)) {
layoutChunkResult.resetInternal();
if (VERBOSE_TRACING) {
TraceCompat.beginSection("LLM LayoutChunk");
}
//填充一个表项
layoutChunk(recycler, state, layoutState, layoutChunkResult);
...
}
...
}
}
而fill()是在onLayoutChildren()中被调用：
/**
* Lay out all relevant child views from the given adapter.
* 布局所有给定adapter中相关孩子视图
* 注释太长了，省略了不相关信息
* @param recycler Recycler to use for fetching potentially cached views for a
* position
* @param state Transient state of RecyclerView
*/
public void onLayoutChildren(Recycler recycler, State state) {
Log.e(TAG, "You must override onLayoutChildren(Recycler recycler, State state) ");
}
看完注释，感觉前面猜测应该是正确的。onLayoutChildren()是用来布局RecyclerView中所有的表项的。回头去看一下layoutState.next()，表项复用逻辑应该就在其中。
/**
* Helper class that keeps temporary state while {LayoutManager} is filling out the empty
* space.
*/
static class LayoutState {
/**
* Gets the view for the next element that we should layout.
* 获得下一个元素的视图用于布局
* Also updates current item index to the next item, based on {@link #mItemDirection}
*
* @return The next element that we should layout.
*/
View next(RecyclerView.Recycler recycler) {
if (mScrapList != null) {
return nextViewFromScrapList();
}
//调用了Recycler.getViewForPosition()
final View view = recycler.getViewForPosition(mCurrentPosition);
mCurrentPosition += mItemDirection;
return view;
}
}
最终调用了Recycler.getViewForPosition()，Recycler是回收器的意思，感觉离想要找的“复用”逻辑越来越近了。Recycler到底是做什么用的？：
/**
* A Recycler is responsible for managing scrapped or detached item views for reuse.
* Recycler负责管理scrapped和detached表项的复用
* <p>A "scrapped" view is a view that is still attached to its parent RecyclerView but
* that has been marked for removal or reuse.</p>
*/
public final class Recycler {
...
}
终于找到你~~ ，Recycler用于表项的复用！沿着Recycler.getViewForPosition()的调用链继续向下搜寻，找到了一个关键函数（函数太长了，为了防止头晕，只列出了关键节点）：
/**
* Attempts to get the ViewHolder for the given position, either from the Recycler scrap,
* cache, the RecycledViewPool, or creating it directly.
* 尝试获得指定位置的ViewHolder，要么从scrap，cache，RecycledViewPool中获取，要么直接重新创建
* @return ViewHolder for requested position
*/
@Nullable
ViewHolder tryGetViewHolderForPositionByDeadline(int position,
boolean dryRun, long deadlineNs) {
...
boolean fromScrapOrHiddenOrCache = false;
ViewHolder holder = null;
//0 从changed scrap集合中获取ViewHolder
if (mState.isPreLayout()) {
holder = getChangedScrapViewForPosition(position);
fromScrapOrHiddenOrCache = holder != null;
}
//1. 通过position从attach scrap或一级回收缓存中获取ViewHolder
if (holder == null) {
holder = getScrapOrHiddenOrCachedHolderForPosition(position, dryRun);
...
}
if (holder == null) {
...
final int type = mAdapter.getItemViewType(offsetPosition);
//2. 通过id在attach scrap集合和一级回收缓存中查找viewHolder
if (mAdapter.hasStableIds()) {
holder = getScrapOrCachedViewForId(mAdapter.getItemId(offsetPosition),
type, dryRun);
...
}
//3. 从自定义缓存中获取ViewHolder
if (holder == null && mViewCacheExtension != null) {
// We are NOT sending the offsetPosition because LayoutManager does not
// know it.
final View view = mViewCacheExtension
.getViewForPositionAndType(this, position, type);
...
}
//4.从缓存池中拿ViewHolder
if (holder == null) { // fallback to pool
...
holder = getRecycledViewPool().getRecycledView(type);
...
}
//所有缓存都没有命中，只能创建ViewHolder
if (holder == null) {
...
holder = mAdapter.createViewHolder(RecyclerView.this, type);
...
}
}
boolean bound = false;
if (mState.isPreLayout() && holder.isBound()) {
// do not update unless we absolutely have to.
holder.mPreLayoutPosition = position;
}
//只有invalid的viewHolder才能绑定视图数据
else if (!holder.isBound() || holder.needsUpdate() || holder.isInvalid()) {
if (DEBUG && holder.isRemoved()) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Removed holder should be bound and it should"
+ " come here only in pre-layout. Holder: " + holder
+ exceptionLabel());
}
final int offsetPosition = mAdapterHelper.findPositionOffset(position);
//获得ViewHolder后，绑定视图数据
bound = tryBindViewHolderByDeadline(holder, offsetPosition, position, deadlineNs);
}
...
return holder;
}
- 函数的名字以“tryGet”开头，“尝试获得”表示可能获得失败，再结合注释中说的：“尝试获得指定位置的ViewHolder，要么从scrap，cache，RecycledViewPool中，要么直接重新创建。”猜测scrap，cache，RecycledViewPool是回收表项的容器，相当于表项缓存，如果缓存未命中则只能重新创建。
- 函数的返回值是
ViewHolder，难道回收和复用的是ViewHolder? 函数开头声明了局部变量ViewHolder holder = null;最终返回的也是这个局部变量，并且有4处holder == null的判断，这样的代码结构是不是有点像缓存？每次判空意味着上一级缓存未命中并继续尝试新的获取方法？缓存是不是有不止一种存储形式？ 让我们一次一次地看：
第一次尝试
ViewHolder tryGetViewHolderForPositionByDeadline(int position,
boolean dryRun, long deadlineNs) {
...
if (mState.isPreLayout()) {
holder = getChangedScrapViewForPosition(position);
fromScrapOrHiddenOrCache = holder != null;
}
...
}
只有在mState.isPreLayout()为true时才会做这次尝试，这应该是一种特殊情况，先忽略。
第二次尝试
ViewHolder tryGetViewHolderForPositionByDeadline(int position,
boolean dryRun, long deadlineNs) {
...
if (holder == null) {
holder = getScrapOrHiddenOrCachedHolderForPosition(position, dryRun);
//下面一段代码蕴含着一个线索，买个伏笔，先把他略去
...
}
...
}
- 当第一次尝试失败后，尝试通过
getScrapOrHiddenOrCachedHolderForPosition()获得ViewHolder。 - 这里故意省略了一段代码，先埋个伏笔，待会分析。先沿着获取
ViewHolder的调用链继续往下：
//省略非关键代码
/**
* Returns a view for the position either from attach scrap, hidden children, or cache.
* 从attach scrap，hidden children或者cache中获得指定位置上的一个ViewHolder
*/
ViewHolder getScrapOrHiddenOrCachedHolderForPosition(int position, boolean dryRun) {
final int scrapCount = mAttachedScrap.size();
// Try first for an exact, non-invalid match from scrap.
//1.在attached scrap中搜索ViewHolder
for (int i = 0; i < scrapCount; i++) {
final ViewHolder holder = mAttachedScrap.get(i);
if (!holder.wasReturnedFromScrap() && holder.getLayoutPosition() == position
&& !holder.isInvalid() && (mState.mInPreLayout || !holder.isRemoved())) {
holder.addFlags(ViewHolder.FLAG_RETURNED_FROM_SCRAP);
return holder;
}
}
//2.从移除屏幕的视图中搜索ViewHolder，找到了之后将他存入scrap回收集合中
if (!dryRun) {
View view = mChildHelper.findHiddenNonRemovedView(position);
if (view != null) {
final ViewHolder vh = getChildViewHolderInt(view);
mChildHelper.unhide(view);
int layoutIndex = mChildHelper.indexOfChild(view);
...
mChildHelper.detachViewFromParent(layoutIndex);
scrapView(view);
vh.addFlags(ViewHolder.FLAG_RETURNED_FROM_SCRAP
| ViewHolder.FLAG_BOUNCED_FROM_HIDDEN_LIST);
return vh;
}
}
// Search in our first-level recycled view cache.
//3.在缓存中搜索ViewHolder
final int cacheSize = mCachedViews.size();
for (int i = 0; i < cacheSize; i++) {
final ViewHolder holder = mCachedViews.get(i);
if (!holder.isInvalid() && holder.getLayoutPosition() == position) {
...
return holder;
}
}
return null;
}
依次从三个地方搜索ViewHolder：1. mAttachedScrap 2. 隐藏表项 3. mCachedViews，找到立即返回。
其中mAttachedScrap和mCachedViews作为Recycler的成员变量，用来存储一组ViewHolder：
public final class Recycler {
final ArrayList<ViewHolder> mAttachedScrap = new ArrayList<>();
...
final ArrayList<ViewHolder> mCachedViews = new ArrayList<ViewHolder>();
...
RecycledViewPool mRecyclerPool;
}
- 看到这里应该可以初步得出结论：RecyclerView回收机制中，回收复用的对象是
ViewHolder，且以ArrayList为结构存储在Recycler对象中。 -
RecycledViewPool mRecyclerPool;看着也像是回收容器，那待会是不是也会到这里拿ViewHolder? - 回到刚才埋下的伏笔，把第二次尝试获取
ViewHolder的代码补全：
ViewHolder tryGetViewHolderForPositionByDeadline(int position,
boolean dryRun, long deadlineNs) {
...
if (holder == null) {
holder = getScrapOrHiddenOrCachedHolderForPosition(position, dryRun);
//下面一段代码蕴含这一个线索，买个伏笔，先把他略去
if (holder != null) {
//检验ViewHolder有效性
if (!validateViewHolderForOffsetPosition(holder)) {
// recycle holder (and unscrap if relevant) since it can't be used
if (!dryRun) {
// we would like to recycle this but need to make sure it is not used by
// animation logic etc.
holder.addFlags(ViewHolder.FLAG_INVALID);
if (holder.isScrap()) {
removeDetachedView(holder.itemView, false);
holder.unScrap();
} else if (holder.wasReturnedFromScrap()) {
holder.clearReturnedFromScrapFlag();
}
//若不满足有效性检验，则回收ViewHolder
recycleViewHolderInternal(holder);
}
holder = null;
} else {
fromScrapOrHiddenOrCache = true;
}
}
}
...
}
如果成功获得ViewHolder则检验其有效性，若检验失败则将其回收。好不容易获取了ViewHoler对象，一言不合就把他回收？难道对所有复用的 ViewHolder 都有这么严格的检验吗？暂时无法回答这些疑问，还是先把复用逻辑看完吧：
第三次尝试
ViewHolder tryGetViewHolderForPositionByDeadline(int position,
boolean dryRun, long deadlineNs) {
...
//只有当Adapter设置了id，才会进行这次查找
if (mAdapter.hasStableIds()) {
holder = getScrapOrCachedViewForId(mAdapter.getItemId(offsetPosition),type, dryRun);
if (holder != null) {
// update position
holder.mPosition = offsetPosition;
fromScrapOrHiddenOrCache = true;
}
}
...
}
这一次尝试调用的函数名（“byId”）和上一次（“byPosition”）只是后缀不一样。上一次是通过表项位置，这一次是通过表项id。内部实现也几乎一样，判断的依据从表项位置变成表项id。为表项设置id属于特殊情况，先忽略。
第四次尝试
ViewHolder tryGetViewHolderForPositionByDeadline(int position,
boolean dryRun, long deadlineNs) {
...
if (holder == null && mViewCacheExtension != null) {
// We are NOT sending the offsetPosition because LayoutManager does not
// know it.
final View view = mViewCacheExtension.getViewForPositionAndType(this, position, type);
if (view != null) {
//获得view对应的ViewHolder
holder = getChildViewHolder(view);
if (holder == null) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("getViewForPositionAndType returned"
+ " a view which does not have a ViewHolder"
+ exceptionLabel());
} else if (holder.shouldIgnore()) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("getViewForPositionAndType returned"
+ " a view that is ignored. You must call stopIgnoring before"
+ " returning this view." + exceptionLabel());
}
}
}
...
}
经过从mAttachedScrap和mCachedViews获取ViewHolder未果后，继续尝试通过ViewCacheExtension获取：
/**
* ViewCacheExtension is a helper class to provide an additional layer of view caching that can
* be controlled by the developer.
* ViewCacheExtension提供了额外的表项缓存层，用户帮助开发者自己控制表项缓存
* <p>
* When {@link Recycler#getViewForPosition(int)} is called, Recycler checks attached scrap and
* first level cache to find a matching View. If it cannot find a suitable View, Recycler will
* call the {@link #getViewForPositionAndType(Recycler, int, int)} before checking
* {@link RecycledViewPool}.
* 当Recycler从attached scrap和first level cache中未能找到匹配的表项时，它会在去RecycledViewPool中查找之前，先尝试从自定义缓存中查找
* <p>
*/
public abstract static class ViewCacheExtension {
/**
* Returns a View that can be binded to the given Adapter position.
* <p>
* This method should <b>not</b> create a new View. Instead, it is expected to return
* an already created View that can be re-used for the given type and position.
* If the View is marked as ignored, it should first call
* {@link LayoutManager#stopIgnoringView(View)} before returning the View.
* <p>
* RecyclerView will re-bind the returned View to the position if necessary.
*/
public abstract View getViewForPositionAndType(Recycler recycler, int position, int type);
}
注释揭露了很多信息：ViewCacheExtension用于开发者自定义表项缓存，且这层缓存的访问顺序位于mAttachedScrap和mCachedViews之后，RecycledViewPool之前。这和Recycler. tryGetViewHolderForPositionByDeadline()中的代码逻辑一致，那接下来的第五次尝试，应该是从 RecycledViewPool 中获取 ViewHolder
第五次尝试
ViewHolder tryGetViewHolderForPositionByDeadline(int position,
boolean dryRun, long deadlineNs) {
...
if (holder == null) {
...
//从回收池中获取ViewHolder对象
holder = getRecycledViewPool().getRecycledView(type);
if (holder != null) {
holder.resetInternal();
if (FORCE_INVALIDATE_DISPLAY_LIST) {
invalidateDisplayListInt(holder);
}
}
}
...
}
前四次尝试都未果，最后从RecycledViewPool中获取ViewHolder。稍等片刻！相对于从mAttachedScrap 和 mCachedViews 中获取 ViewHolder，此处并没有严格的检验逻辑。为啥要区别对待不同的缓存？大大的问号悬在头顶，但现在暂时无法解答，还是接着看RecycledViewPool的结构吧~
public final class Recycler {
...
RecycledViewPool mRecyclerPool;
//获得RecycledViewPool实例
RecycledViewPool getRecycledViewPool() {
if (mRecyclerPool == null) {
mRecyclerPool = new RecycledViewPool();
}
return mRecyclerPool;
}
...
}
public static class RecycledViewPool {
...
//从回收池中获取ViewHolder对象
public ViewHolder getRecycledView(int viewType) {
final ScrapData scrapData = mScrap.get(viewType);
if (scrapData != null && !scrapData.mScrapHeap.isEmpty()) {
final ArrayList<ViewHolder> scrapHeap = scrapData.mScrapHeap;
return scrapHeap.remove(scrapHeap.size() - 1);
}
return null;
}
...
}
函数中只要访问了类成员变量，它的复杂度就提高了，因为类成员变量的作用于超出了函数体，使得函数就和类中其他函数耦合，所以不得不进行阅读更多以帮助理解该函数：
public static class RecycledViewPool {
//同类ViewHolder缓存个数上限
private static final int DEFAULT_MAX_SCRAP = 5;
/**
* Tracks both pooled holders, as well as create/bind timing metadata for the given type.
* 回收池中存放单个类型ViewHolder的容器
*/
static class ScrapData {
//同类ViewHolder存储在ArrayList中
ArrayList<ViewHolder> mScrapHeap = new ArrayList<>();
//每种类型的ViewHolder最多存5个
int mMaxScrap = DEFAULT_MAX_SCRAP;
}
//回收池中存放所有类型ViewHolder的容器
SparseArray<ScrapData> mScrap = new SparseArray<>();
...
//ViewHolder入池 按viewType分类入池，一个类型的ViewType存放在一个ScrapData中
public void putRecycledView(ViewHolder scrap) {
final int viewType = scrap.getItemViewType();
final ArrayList<ViewHolder> scrapHeap = getScrapDataForType(viewType).mScrapHeap;
//如果超限了，则放弃入池
if (mScrap.get(viewType).mMaxScrap <= scrapHeap.size()) {
return;
}
if (DEBUG && scrapHeap.contains(scrap)) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("this scrap item already exists");
}
scrap.resetInternal();
//回收时，ViewHolder从列表尾部插入
scrapHeap.add(scrap);
}
//从回收池中获取ViewHolder对象
public ViewHolder getRecycledView(int viewType) {
final ScrapData scrapData = mScrap.get(viewType);
if (scrapData != null && !scrapData.mScrapHeap.isEmpty()) {
final ArrayList<ViewHolder> scrapHeap = scrapData.mScrapHeap;
//复用时，从列表尾部获取ViewHolder（优先复用刚入池的ViewHoler）
return scrapHeap.remove(scrapHeap.size() - 1);
}
return null;
}
}
- 上述代码列出了
RecycledViewPool中最关键的一个成员变量和两个函数。至此可以得出结论：RecycledViewPool中的ViewHolder存储在SparseArray中，并且按viewType分类存储（即是Adapter.getItemViewType()的返回值），同一类型的ViewHolder存放在ArrayList中，且默认最多存储5个。
创建ViewHolder并绑定数据
ViewHolder tryGetViewHolderForPositionByDeadline(int position,boolean dryRun, long deadlineNs) {
...
//所有缓存都没有命中，只能创建ViewHolder
if (holder == null) {
...
holder = mAdapter.createViewHolder(RecyclerView.this, type);
...
}
...
boolean bound = false;
if (mState.isPreLayout() && holder.isBound()) {
// do not update unless we absolutely have to.
holder.mPreLayoutPosition = position;
}
//如果表项没有绑定过数据 或 表项需要更新 或 表项无效 且表项没有被移除时绑定表项数据
else if (!holder.isBound() || holder.needsUpdate() || holder.isInvalid()) {
if (DEBUG && holder.isRemoved()) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Removed holder should be bound and it should"
+ " come here only in pre-layout. Holder: " + holder
+ exceptionLabel());
}
final int offsetPosition = mAdapterHelper.findPositionOffset(position);
//为表项绑定数据
bound = tryBindViewHolderByDeadline(holder, offsetPosition, position, deadlineNs);
}
}
- 再进行了上述所有尝试后，如果依然没有获得
ViewHolder，只能重新创建并绑定数据。沿着调用链往下，就会找到熟悉的onCreateViewHolder()和onBindViewHolder()。 - 绑定数据的逻辑嵌套在一个大大的if中（原来并不是每次都要绑定数据，只有满足特定条件时才需要绑定。）
- 那什么情况下需要绑定，什么情况下不需要呢？这就要引出“缓存优先级”这个概念。
缓存优先级
-
缓存有优先级一说，在使用图片二级缓存（内存+磁盘）时，会先尝试去优先级高的内存中获取，若未命中再去磁盘中获取。优先级越高意味着性能越好。
RecyclerView的缓存机制中是否也能套用“缓存优先级”这一逻辑？ -
虽然为了获取
ViewHolder做了5次尝试（共从6个地方获取），先排除3种特殊情况，即从mChangedScrap获取、通过id获取、从自定义缓存获取，正常流程中只剩下3种获取方式，优先级从高到低依次是：- 从
mAttachedScrap获取 - 从
mCachedViews获取 - 从
mRecyclerPool获取
- 从
-
这样的缓存优先级是不是意味着，对应的复用性能也是从高到低？（复用性能越好意味着所做的昂贵操作越少）
- 最坏情况：重新创建
ViewHodler并重新绑定数据 - 次好情况：复用
ViewHolder但重新绑定数据 - 最好情况：复用
ViewHolder且不重新绑定数据
毫无疑问，所有缓存都未命中的情况下会发生最坏情况。剩下的两种情况应该由3种获取方式来分摊，猜测优先级最低的
mRecyclerPool方式应该命中次好情况，去源码中验证一下： - 最坏情况：重新创建
ViewHolder tryGetViewHolderForPositionByDeadline(int position,
boolean dryRun, long deadlineNs) {
...
if (holder == null) {
...
//从回收池中获取ViewHolder对象
holder = getRecycledViewPool().getRecycledView(type);
if (holder != null) {
//重置ViewHolder
holder.resetInternal();
if (FORCE_INVALIDATE_DISPLAY_LIST) {
invalidateDisplayListInt(holder);
}
}
}
...
}
public abstract static class ViewHolder {
/**
* 将ViewHolder重置
*/
void resetInternal() {
//将ViewHolder的flag置0
mFlags = 0;
mPosition = NO_POSITION;
mOldPosition = NO_POSITION;
mItemId = NO_ID;
mPreLayoutPosition = NO_POSITION;
mIsRecyclableCount = 0;
mShadowedHolder = null;
mShadowingHolder = null;
clearPayload();
mWasImportantForAccessibilityBeforeHidden = ViewCompat.IMPORTANT_FOR_ACCESSIBILITY_AUTO;
mPendingAccessibilityState = PENDING_ACCESSIBILITY_STATE_NOT_SET;
clearNestedRecyclerViewIfNotNested(this);
}
}
温故知新，回看 mRecyclerPool复用逻辑时，发现在成功获得ViewHolder对象后，立即对其重置（将flag置0），回看一下上节提到的“绑定数据条件”：
ViewHolder tryGetViewHolderForPositionByDeadline(int position,
boolean dryRun, long deadlineNs) {
...
//如果表项没有绑定过数据 或 表项需要更新 或 表项无效 且表项没有被移除时绑定表项数据
else if (!holder.isBound() || holder.needsUpdate() || holder.isInvalid()) {
if (DEBUG && holder.isRemoved()) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Removed holder should be bound and it should"
+ " come here only in pre-layout. Holder: " + holder
+ exceptionLabel());
}
final int offsetPosition = mAdapterHelper.findPositionOffset(position);
//为表项绑定数据
bound = tryBindViewHolderByDeadline(holder, offsetPosition, position, deadlineNs);
}
....
}
public abstract static class ViewHolder {
/**
* This ViewHolder has been bound to a position; mPosition, mItemId and mItemViewType
* are all valid.
* 绑定标志位
*/
static final int FLAG_BOUND = 1 << 0;
//判断ViewHolder是否被绑定
boolean isBound() {
//将当前ViewHolder对象的flag和绑定标志位做位与操作
return (mFlags & FLAG_BOUND) != 0;
}
}
判断是否要绑定数据的三个条件中的第一个条件成立（因为0和非0位与之后必然为0）。所以猜测成立：从mRecyclerPool中复用的ViewHolder需要重新绑定数据。
总结
- 在
RecyclerView中，并不是每次绘制表项，都会重新创建ViewHolder对象，也不是每次都会重新绑定ViewHolder数据。 RecyclerView通过Recycler获得下一个待绘制表项。Recycler有4个层次用于缓存ViewHolder对象，优先级从高到底依次为ArrayList<ViewHolder> mAttachedScrap、ArrayList<ViewHolder> mCachedViews、ViewCacheExtension mViewCacheExtension、RecycledViewPool mRecyclerPool。如果四层缓存都未命中，则重新创建并绑定ViewHolder对象RecycledViewPool对ViewHolder按viewType分类存储（通过SparseArray），同类ViewHolder存储在默认大小为5的ArrayList中-
从
mRecyclerPool中复用的ViewHolder需要重新绑定数据。
这篇文章粗略的回答了关于“复用”的4个问题，即“复用什么？”、“从哪里获得复用？”，“什么时候复用？”，“复用优先级”读到这里，可能会有很多疑问：
-
scrap view是什么？ -
changed scrap view和attached scrap view有什么区别？ - 复用的
ViewHolder是在什么时候被缓存的？ - 为什么要4层缓存？它们的用途有什么区别？
分析完复用，后续文章会进一步分析“RecyclerView机制（回收）”，希望到时候这些问题都能迎刃而解。
