JAVA并发之AQS
2018-07-30 本文已影响0人
猿崛起
https://www.cnblogs.com/waterystone/p/4920797.html
/**
- Provides a framework for implementing blocking locks and related
- synchronizers (semaphores, events, etc) that rely on
- first-in-first-out (FIFO) wait queues. This class is designed to
- be a useful basis for most kinds of synchronizers that rely on a
- single atomic {@code int} value to represent state. Subclasses
- must define the protected methods that change this state, and which
- define what that state means in terms of this object being acquired
- or released. Given these, the other methods in this class carry
- out all queuing and blocking mechanics. Subclasses can maintain
- other state fields, but only the atomically updated {@code int}
- value manipulated using methods {@link #getState}, {@link
-
setState} and {@link #compareAndSetState} is tracked with respect
- to synchronization.
- <p>Subclasses should be defined as non-public internal helper
- classes that are used to implement the synchronization properties
- of their enclosing class. Class
- {@code AbstractQueuedSynchronizer} does not implement any
- synchronization interface. Instead it defines methods such as
- {@link #acquireInterruptibly} that can be invoked as
- appropriate by concrete locks and related synchronizers to
- implement their public methods.
- <p>This class supports either or both a default <em>exclusive</em>
- mode and a <em>shared</em> mode. When acquired in exclusive mode,
- attempted acquires by other threads cannot succeed. Shared mode
- acquires by multiple threads may (but need not) succeed. This class
- does not "understand" these differences except in the
- mechanical sense that when a shared mode acquire succeeds, the next
- waiting thread (if one exists) must also determine whether it can
- acquire as well. Threads waiting in the different modes share the
- same FIFO queue. Usually, implementation subclasses support only
- one of these modes, but both can come into play for example in a
- {@link ReadWriteLock}. Subclasses that support only exclusive or
- only shared modes need not define the methods supporting the unused mode.
- <p>This class defines a nested {@link ConditionObject} class that
- can be used as a {@link Condition} implementation by subclasses
- supporting exclusive mode for which method {@link
-
isHeldExclusively} reports whether synchronization is exclusively
- held with respect to the current thread, method {@link #release}
- invoked with the current {@link #getState} value fully releases
- this object, and {@link #acquire}, given this saved state value,
- eventually restores this object to its previous acquired state. No
- {@code AbstractQueuedSynchronizer} method otherwise creates such a
- condition, so if this constraint cannot be met, do not use it. The
- behavior of {@link ConditionObject} depends of course on the
- semantics of its synchronizer implementation.
- <p>This class provides inspection, instrumentation, and monitoring
- methods for the internal queue, as well as similar methods for
- condition objects. These can be exported as desired into classes
- using an {@code AbstractQueuedSynchronizer} for their
- synchronization mechanics.
- <p>Serialization of this class stores only the underlying atomic
- integer maintaining state, so deserialized objects have empty
- thread queues. Typical subclasses requiring serializability will
- define a {@code readObject} method that restores this to a known
- initial state upon deserialization.
- <h3>Usage</h3>
- <p>To use this class as the basis of a synchronizer, redefine the
- following methods, as applicable, by inspecting and/or modifying
- the synchronization state using {@link #getState}, {@link
-
setState} and/or {@link #compareAndSetState}:
- <ul>
- <li> {@link #tryAcquire}
- <li> {@link #tryRelease}
- <li> {@link #tryAcquireShared}
- <li> {@link #tryReleaseShared}
- <li> {@link #isHeldExclusively}
- </ul>
- Each of these methods by default throws {@link
- UnsupportedOperationException}. Implementations of these methods
- must be internally thread-safe, and should in general be short and
- not block. Defining these methods is the <em>only</em> supported
- means of using this class. All other methods are declared
- {@code final} because they cannot be independently varied.
- <p>You may also find the inherited methods from {@link
- AbstractOwnableSynchronizer} useful to keep track of the thread
- owning an exclusive synchronizer. You are encouraged to use them
- -- this enables monitoring and diagnostic tools to assist users in
- determining which threads hold locks.
- <p>Even though this class is based on an internal FIFO queue, it
- does not automatically enforce FIFO acquisition policies. The core
- of exclusive synchronization takes the form:
- <pre>
- Acquire:
while (!tryAcquire(arg)) {
<em>enqueue thread if it is not already queued</em>;
<em>possibly block current thread</em>;
}
- Release:
if (tryRelease(arg))
<em>unblock the first queued thread</em>;
- </pre>
- (Shared mode is similar but may involve cascading signals.)
- <p id="barging">Because checks in acquire are invoked before
- enqueuing, a newly acquiring thread may <em>barge</em> ahead of
- others that are blocked and queued. However, you can, if desired,
- define {@code tryAcquire} and/or {@code tryAcquireShared} to
- disable barging by internally invoking one or more of the inspection
- methods, thereby providing a <em>fair</em> FIFO acquisition order.
- In particular, most fair synchronizers can define {@code tryAcquire}
- to return {@code false} if {@link #hasQueuedPredecessors} (a method
- specifically designed to be used by fair synchronizers) returns
- {@code true}. Other variations are possible.
- <p>Throughput and scalability are generally highest for the
- default barging (also known as <em>greedy</em>,
- <em>renouncement</em>, and <em>convoy-avoidance</em>) strategy.
- While this is not guaranteed to be fair or starvation-free, earlier
- queued threads are allowed to recontend before later queued
- threads, and each recontention has an unbiased chance to succeed
- against incoming threads. Also, while acquires do not
- "spin" in the usual sense, they may perform multiple
- invocations of {@code tryAcquire} interspersed with other
- computations before blocking. This gives most of the benefits of
- spins when exclusive synchronization is only briefly held, without
- most of the liabilities when it isn't. If so desired, you can
- augment this by preceding calls to acquire methods with
- "fast-path" checks, possibly prechecking {@link #hasContended}
- and/or {@link #hasQueuedThreads} to only do so if the synchronizer
- is likely not to be contended.
- <p>This class provides an efficient and scalable basis for
- synchronization in part by specializing its range of use to
- synchronizers that can rely on {@code int} state, acquire, and
- release parameters, and an internal FIFO wait queue. When this does
- not suffice, you can build synchronizers from a lower level using
- {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic atomic} classes, your own custom
- {@link java.util.Queue} classes, and {@link LockSupport} blocking
- support.
- <h3>Usage Examples</h3>
- <p>Here is a non-reentrant mutual exclusion lock class that uses
- the value zero to represent the unlocked state, and one to
- represent the locked state. While a non-reentrant lock
- does not strictly require recording of the current owner
- thread, this class does so anyway to make usage easier to monitor.
- It also supports conditions and exposes
- one of the instrumentation methods:
- <pre> {@code
- class Mutex implements Lock, java.io.Serializable {
- // Our internal helper class
- private static class Sync extends AbstractQueuedSynchronizer {
// Reports whether in locked state
protected boolean isHeldExclusively() {
return getState() == 1;
}
// Acquires the lock if state is zero
public boolean tryAcquire(int acquires) {
assert acquires == 1; // Otherwise unused
if (compareAndSetState(0, 1)) {
setExclusiveOwnerThread(Thread.currentThread());
return true;
}
return false;
}
// Releases the lock by setting state to zero
protected boolean tryRelease(int releases) {
assert releases == 1; // Otherwise unused
if (getState() == 0) throw new IllegalMonitorStateException();
setExclusiveOwnerThread(null);
setState(0);
return true;
}
// Provides a Condition
Condition newCondition() { return new ConditionObject(); }
// Deserializes properly
private void readObject(ObjectInputStream s)
throws IOException, ClassNotFoundException {
s.defaultReadObject();
setState(0); // reset to unlocked state
}
- }
- // The sync object does all the hard work. We just forward to it.
- private final Sync sync = new Sync();
- public void lock() { sync.acquire(1); }
- public boolean tryLock() { return sync.tryAcquire(1); }
- public void unlock() { sync.release(1); }
- public Condition newCondition() { return sync.newCondition(); }
- public boolean isLocked() { return sync.isHeldExclusively(); }
- public boolean hasQueuedThreads() { return sync.hasQueuedThreads(); }
- public void lockInterruptibly() throws InterruptedException {
sync.acquireInterruptibly(1);
- }
- public boolean tryLock(long timeout, TimeUnit unit)
throws InterruptedException {
return sync.tryAcquireNanos(1, unit.toNanos(timeout));
- }
- }}</pre>
- <p>Here is a latch class that is like a
- {@link java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch CountDownLatch}
- except that it only requires a single {@code signal} to
- fire. Because a latch is non-exclusive, it uses the {@code shared}
- acquire and release methods.
- <pre> {@code
- class BooleanLatch {
- private static class Sync extends AbstractQueuedSynchronizer {
boolean isSignalled() { return getState() != 0; }
protected int tryAcquireShared(int ignore) {
return isSignalled() ? 1 : -1;
}
protected boolean tryReleaseShared(int ignore) {
setState(1);
return true;
}
- }
- private final Sync sync = new Sync();
- public boolean isSignalled() { return sync.isSignalled(); }
- public void signal() { sync.releaseShared(1); }
- public void await() throws InterruptedException {
sync.acquireSharedInterruptibly(1);
- }
- }}</pre>