HumanEval

原文地址：https://alphahinex.github.io/2023/12/31/human-eval/

---

description: "HumanEval 用法简介"
date: 2023.12.31 10:34
categories:
- AI
tags: [AI, Python]
keywords: HumanEval, OpenAI, FastChat, sample, pass@k

---

HumanEval 是 OpenAI 用来评估大语言模型生成代码能力的工具，包括手写的 164 个 python 编程问题及解答的 jsonl 格式数据，以及执行评估的脚本。

数据集

先来看下数据集，下面是 HumanEval.jsonl.gz 中的一条数据：

{
    "task_id": "HumanEval/0",
    "prompt": "from typing import List\n\n\ndef has_close_elements(numbers: List[float], threshold: float) -> bool:\n    \"\"\" Check if in given list of numbers, are any two numbers closer to each other than\n    given threshold.\n    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 3.0], 0.5)\n    False\n    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.8, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 2.0], 0.3)\n    True\n    \"\"\"\n",
    "entry_point": "has_close_elements",
    "canonical_solution": "    for idx, elem in enumerate(numbers):\n        for idx2, elem2 in enumerate(numbers):\n            if idx != idx2:\n                distance = abs(elem - elem2)\n                if distance < threshold:\n                    return True\n\n    return False\n",
    "test": "\n\nMETADATA = {\n    'author': 'jt',\n    'dataset': 'test'\n}\n\n\ndef check(candidate):\n    assert candidate([1.0, 2.0, 3.9, 4.0, 5.0, 2.2], 0.3) == True\n    assert candidate([1.0, 2.0, 3.9, 4.0, 5.0, 2.2], 0.05) == False\n    assert candidate([1.0, 2.0, 5.9, 4.0, 5.0], 0.95) == True\n    assert candidate([1.0, 2.0, 5.9, 4.0, 5.0], 0.8) == False\n    assert candidate([1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 2.0], 0.1) == True\n    assert candidate([1.1, 2.2, 3.1, 4.1, 5.1], 1.0) == True\n    assert candidate([1.1, 2.2, 3.1, 4.1, 5.1], 0.5) == False\n\n"
}

数据结构为：

{
    "task_id": "问题编号",
    "prompt": "提示词",
    "entry_point": "入口函数",
    "canonical_solution": "手写答案",
    "test": "测试用例"
}

prompt：

from typing import List


def has_close_elements(numbers: List[float], threshold: float) -> bool:
    """ Check if in given list of numbers, are any two numbers closer to each other than
    given threshold.
    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.0, 3.0], 0.5)
    False
    >>> has_close_elements([1.0, 2.8, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 2.0], 0.3)
    True
    """

canonical_solution：

    for idx, elem in enumerate(numbers):
        for idx2, elem2 in enumerate(numbers):
            if idx != idx2:
                distance = abs(elem - elem2)
                if distance < threshold:
                    return True

    return False

test：

METADATA = {
    'author': 'jt',
    'dataset': 'test'
}


def check(candidate):
    assert candidate([1.0, 2.0, 3.9, 4.0, 5.0, 2.2], 0.3) == True
    assert candidate([1.0, 2.0, 3.9, 4.0, 5.0, 2.2], 0.05) == False
    assert candidate([1.0, 2.0, 5.9, 4.0, 5.0], 0.95) == True
    assert candidate([1.0, 2.0, 5.9, 4.0, 5.0], 0.8) == False
    assert candidate([1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 2.0], 0.1) == True
    assert candidate([1.1, 2.2, 3.1, 4.1, 5.1], 1.0) == True
    assert candidate([1.1, 2.2, 3.1, 4.1, 5.1], 0.5) == False

评估方式

将每条数据的 prompt 输入给大模型，拼接上大模型生成的代码，作为被 test 测试的 candidate 方法，执行测试用例记录测试结果是否通过。

需要准备一份 jsonl 格式的用来评估的样本文件，格式如下：

{"task_id": "Corresponding HumanEval task ID", "completion": "Completion only without the prompt"}
{"task_id": "Corresponding HumanEval task ID", "completion": "Completion only without the prompt"}
...

可以为同一个 task_id 生成多个待评估样本，假设样本数量为 k，其中有一个样本的测试用例能通过即被认为此 task_id 的状态是通过的，也就是通常使用 HumanEval 的评估结果标记为 pass@k 中 k 的含义，执行评估后会得到被评估样本通过所有评估问题的概率，如 Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Code 论文中给出的数据：

pass@k

生成样本

下面给出一段生成样本文件的示例代码：调用通过 FastChat 为大语言模型代理的 Create completion 接口，为每个 task 生成 num_samples_per_task 个样本，生成样本文件为 samples.jsonl。

import time
from datetime import datetime

import json
import requests
from human_eval.data import write_jsonl, read_problems

problems = read_problems()

def generate_one_completion(task_id, prompt):
    print(datetime.now().strftime("%H:%M:%S"), task_id)
    url = 'http://localhost:9000/v1/completions'
    headers = {'Content-Type': 'application/json', 'Connection': 'close'}
    data = {
        "model": "starcoder",
        "prompt": prompt,
        "max_tokens": 1000,
        "temperature": 0.2
    }
    try:
        response = requests.post(url, headers=headers, json=data)
        result = json.loads(response.text)["choices"][0]["text"]
        print(result)
        return result
    except:
        print(f"Exception occurs, wait 3 seconds then retry...")
        time.sleep(3)
        generate_one_completion(task_id, prompt)


num_samples_per_task = 1
for task_id in problems:
    for _ in range(num_samples_per_task):
        samples = [
            dict(task_id=task_id, completion=generate_one_completion(task_id, problems[task_id]["prompt"]))
        ]
        write_jsonl("samples.jsonl", samples, True)

执行评估

pip install 过 human-eval 后，可直接使用 evaluate_functional_correctness samples.jsonl 命令对样本文件进行评估，或通过 python evaluate_functional_correctness.py samples.jsonl 执行评估：

$ evaluate_functional_correctness samples.jsonl
Reading samples...
32800it [00:01, 23787.50it/s]
Running test suites...
100%|...| 32800/32800 [16:11<00:00, 33.76it/s]
Writing results to samples.jsonl_results.jsonl...
100%|...| 32800/32800 [00:00<00:00, 42876.84it/s]
{'pass@1': ..., 'pass@10': ..., 'pass@100': ...}