一步步探索学习Android Touch事件分发传递机制（三）
2017-12-04 本文已影响0人
Alan_Mo
前言
该系列文章分三篇：
- 一步步探索学习Android Touch事件分发传递机制（一）
通过写demo打Log，以ACTION_DOWN事件为例，完整了解整个Android Touch事件分发传递机制。
- 一步步探索学习Android Touch事件分发传递机制（二）
探索了ACTION_MOVE和ACTION_UP事件的分发传递规律。
- 一步步探索学习Android Touch事件分发传递机制（三）
即本篇，将通过Android源码分析，从本质上认识Android Touch事件分发传递机制。
1. dispatchTouchEvent()方法源码分析
1.1 Activity的dispatchTouchEvent()方法
- 源码：
/**
* Called to process touch screen events. You can override this to
* intercept all touch screen events before they are dispatched to the
* window. Be sure to call this implementation for touch screen events
* that should be handled normally.
*
* @param ev The touch screen event.
*
* @return boolean Return true if this event was consumed.
*/
public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev) {
if (ev.getAction() == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) {
//当判断是ACTION_DOWN事件，回调onUserInteraction()
onUserInteraction();
}
if (getWindow().superDispatchTouchEvent(ev)) {
//getWindow（）方法拿到的是PhoneWindow的实例
return true;
}
//如果没有找到消费该事件的子View，最终会交给Activity的onTouchEvent()处理
return onTouchEvent(ev);
}
- 分析：
-
该方法首先判断传递进来的是不是一个ACTION_DOWN事件，if 是，就触发一个叫做 onUserInteraction()的回调方法。
-
onUserInteraction()方法在Activity.java中是个空实现。开发者可以在需要的时候重写它，比如用于判断是不是用户开始做与屏幕交互的事情了。
-
然后，判断调用了getWindow().superDispatchTouchEvent(ev)。getWindow()拿到的是PhoneWindow的实例。
-
这里需要简单说明一下Android窗口结构：
Android Window 结构
-
继续看源码，看看PhoneWindow.java中的superDispatchTouchEvent(ev)方法。
@Override public boolean superDispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) { return mDecor.superDispatchTouchEvent(event); } -
可以看到，这个方法内部又去调用了DecorView的superDispatchTouchEvent(ev)方法。
-
一路这么调用，DecorView其实是FrameLayout的子类，它没重写这个方法，所以最后调用到了ViewGroup的dispatchTouchEvent()方法。
-
1.2 ViewGroup的dispatchTouchEvent()方法
- 源码：
@Override
public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev) {
if (mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {
mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onTouchEvent(ev, 1);
}
// If the event targets the accessibility focused view and this is it, start
// normal event dispatch. Maybe a descendant is what will handle the click.
if (ev.isTargetAccessibilityFocus() && isAccessibilityFocusedViewOrHost()) {
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
}
boolean handled = false;
if (onFilterTouchEventForSecurity(ev)) {
final int action = ev.getAction();
final int actionMasked = action & MotionEvent.ACTION_MASK;
// Handle an initial down.
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) {
// Throw away all previous state when starting a new touch gesture.
// The framework may have dropped the up or cancel event for the previous gesture
// due to an app switch, ANR, or some other state change.
cancelAndClearTouchTargets(ev);
resetTouchState();
}
// Check for interception.
final boolean intercepted;
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
|| mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
final boolean disallowIntercept = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT) != 0;
if (!disallowIntercept) {
intercepted = onInterceptTouchEvent(ev);
ev.setAction(action); // restore action in case it was changed
} else {
intercepted = false;
}
} else {
// There are no touch targets and this action is not an initial down
// so this view group continues to intercept touches.
intercepted = true;
}
// If intercepted, start normal event dispatch. Also if there is already
// a view that is handling the gesture, do normal event dispatch.
if (intercepted || mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
}
// Check for cancelation.
final boolean canceled = resetCancelNextUpFlag(this)
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL;
// Update list of touch targets for pointer down, if needed.
final boolean split = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_SPLIT_MOTION_EVENTS) != 0;
TouchTarget newTouchTarget = null;
boolean alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget = false;
if (!canceled && !intercepted) {
// If the event is targeting accessiiblity focus we give it to the
// view that has accessibility focus and if it does not handle it
// we clear the flag and dispatch the event to all children as usual.
// We are looking up the accessibility focused host to avoid keeping
// state since these events are very rare.
View childWithAccessibilityFocus = ev.isTargetAccessibilityFocus()
? findChildWithAccessibilityFocus() : null;
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
|| (split && actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_POINTER_DOWN)
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_HOVER_MOVE) {
final int actionIndex = ev.getActionIndex(); // always 0 for down
final int idBitsToAssign = split ? 1 << ev.getPointerId(actionIndex)
: TouchTarget.ALL_POINTER_IDS;
// Clean up earlier touch targets for this pointer id in case they
// have become out of sync.
removePointersFromTouchTargets(idBitsToAssign);
final int childrenCount = mChildrenCount;
if (newTouchTarget == null && childrenCount != 0) {
final float x = ev.getX(actionIndex);
final float y = ev.getY(actionIndex);
// Find a child that can receive the event.
// Scan children from front to back.
final ArrayList<View> preorderedList = buildTouchDispatchChildList();
final boolean customOrder = preorderedList == null
&& isChildrenDrawingOrderEnabled();
final View[] children = mChildren;
for (int i = childrenCount - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
final int childIndex = getAndVerifyPreorderedIndex(
childrenCount, i, customOrder);
final View child = getAndVerifyPreorderedView(
preorderedList, children, childIndex);
// If there is a view that has accessibility focus we want it
// to get the event first and if not handled we will perform a
// normal dispatch. We may do a double iteration but this is
// safer given the timeframe.
if (childWithAccessibilityFocus != null) {
if (childWithAccessibilityFocus != child) {
continue;
}
childWithAccessibilityFocus = null;
i = childrenCount - 1;
}
if (!canViewReceivePointerEvents(child)
|| !isTransformedTouchPointInView(x, y, child, null)) {
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
continue;
}
newTouchTarget = getTouchTarget(child);
if (newTouchTarget != null) {
// Child is already receiving touch within its bounds.
// Give it the new pointer in addition to the ones it is handling.
newTouchTarget.pointerIdBits |= idBitsToAssign;
break;
}
resetCancelNextUpFlag(child);
if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, false, child, idBitsToAssign)) {
// Child wants to receive touch within its bounds.
mLastTouchDownTime = ev.getDownTime();
if (preorderedList != null) {
// childIndex points into presorted list, find original index
for (int j = 0; j < childrenCount; j++) {
if (children[childIndex] == mChildren[j]) {
mLastTouchDownIndex = j;
break;
}
}
} else {
mLastTouchDownIndex = childIndex;
}
mLastTouchDownX = ev.getX();
mLastTouchDownY = ev.getY();
newTouchTarget = addTouchTarget(child, idBitsToAssign);
alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget = true;
break;
}
// The accessibility focus didn't handle the event, so clear
// the flag and do a normal dispatch to all children.
ev.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
}
if (preorderedList != null) preorderedList.clear();
}
if (newTouchTarget == null && mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
// Did not find a child to receive the event.
// Assign the pointer to the least recently added target.
newTouchTarget = mFirstTouchTarget;
while (newTouchTarget.next != null) {
newTouchTarget = newTouchTarget.next;
}
newTouchTarget.pointerIdBits |= idBitsToAssign;
}
}
}
// Dispatch to touch targets.
if (mFirstTouchTarget == null) {
// No touch targets so treat this as an ordinary view.
handled = dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, canceled, null,
TouchTarget.ALL_POINTER_IDS);
} else {
// Dispatch to touch targets, excluding the new touch target if we already
// dispatched to it. Cancel touch targets if necessary.
TouchTarget predecessor = null;
TouchTarget target = mFirstTouchTarget;
while (target != null) {
final TouchTarget next = target.next;
if (alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget && target == newTouchTarget) {
handled = true;
} else {
final boolean cancelChild = resetCancelNextUpFlag(target.child)
|| intercepted;
if (dispatchTransformedTouchEvent(ev, cancelChild,
target.child, target.pointerIdBits)) {
handled = true;
}
if (cancelChild) {
if (predecessor == null) {
mFirstTouchTarget = next;
} else {
predecessor.next = next;
}
target.recycle();
target = next;
continue;
}
}
predecessor = target;
target = next;
}
}
// Update list of touch targets for pointer up or cancel, if needed.
if (canceled
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_UP
|| actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_HOVER_MOVE) {
resetTouchState();
} else if (split && actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_POINTER_UP) {
final int actionIndex = ev.getActionIndex();
final int idBitsToRemove = 1 << ev.getPointerId(actionIndex);
removePointersFromTouchTargets(idBitsToRemove);
}
}
if (!handled && mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {
mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onUnhandledEvent(ev, 1);
}
return handled;
}
- 分析：
-
这个方法的代码逻辑比较多，有两百多行。我们去繁就简，理出主要的逻辑就行，毕竟我们只关心Touch事件的流向和处理逻辑。
-
首先来看一下，ViewGroup的dispatchTouchEvent()方法首先是要判断该事件自己要不要拦截下来自己处理。
-
``` java
// Check for interception.
final boolean intercepted;
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
|| mFirstTouchTarget != null) {
final boolean disallowIntercept = (mGroupFlags & FLAG_DISALLOW_INTERCEPT) != 0;
if (!disallowIntercept) {
intercepted = onInterceptTouchEvent(ev);
ev.setAction(action); // restore action in case it was changed
} else {
intercepted = false;
}
} else {
// There are no touch targets and this action is not an initial down
// so this view group continues to intercept touches.
intercepted = true;
}
```
- 这里面我们看到一个很关键的boolean变量***disallowIntercept***，这个变量是控制是不是不允许父控件去拦截该事件的，取值是看***mGroupFlags**的取值*。
> 这里面涉及到一个方法：***requestDisallowInterceptTouchEvent()***方法。这个方法确定***mGroupFlags**的取值*，控制请求父布局不拦截该事件，而是交给自己去做处理。这个方法在处理滑动冲突等场景时经常用到。但在这里为了整个源码分析的逻辑简洁清晰，不再具体分析该方法的代码。
- 还有大家可以注意到一个判断条件： ***if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN|| mFirstTouchTarget != null)***，也就是说ViewGroup去判断这个事件该不该去拦截，首先是这个事件得是ACTION_DOWN事件或者该事件的mFirstTouchTarget（目标子View）是不为空的才会考虑要不要拦截。
- ***这说明mFirstTouchTarget为空的情况下，ACTION_MOVE和ACTION_UP事件是不会经过这个拦截判断的，而是直接intercepted = true表示事件被直接拦截掉。这一点刚好印证了我在[一步步探索学习Android Touch事件分发传递机制（二）](http://blog.csdn.net/alanjet/article/details/78572753)中提到的ACTION_MOVE和ACTION_UP事件的分发规律。***
- 那么mFirstTouchTarget（目标子View）这个变量到底是什么呢？什么时候会为空呢？
- 可以看到ViewGroup的dispatchTouchEvent()方法的后续代码，是一个for循环：
```java
...
for (int i = childrenCount - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
final int childIndex = getAndVerifyPreorderedIndex(
childrenCount, i, customOrder);
final View child = getAndVerifyPreorderedView(
preorderedList, children, childIndex);
// If there is a view that has accessibility focus we want it
// to get the event first and if not handled we will perform a
// normal dispatch. We may do a double iteration but this is
// safer given the timeframe.
}
...
```
- 这个for循环一个一个的遍历子View，寻找看事件的发生坐标在哪个View的范围中，如果找到了，就设置mFirstTouchTarget为child,并且把alreadyDispatchedToNewTouchTarget设置为true。
- 那么事件最终交给自己处理还是目标子View（mFirstTouchTarget）处理？
- 很简单，经过上面的分析可以知道，如果遍历完之后mFirstTouchTarget不为null，就传给mFirstTouchTarget（目标子View）处理；如果为null，就自己消费掉。
- 那其实不管是给目标子View处理还是自己处理，都会跑到View的dispatchTouchEvent()方法。看源码可以知道，当mFirstTouchTarget为null的时候，ViewGoup会调用super.dispatchTouchEvent(event),毕竟ViewGroup本质上是View的子类，所以其实ViewGroup调用的还是View的dispatchTouchEvent()方法。那么我们下面分析View的dispatchTouchEvent()方法。
##### **1.3 View的dispatchTouchEvent()方法**
- 源码：
``` java
/**
* Pass the touch screen motion event down to the target view, or this
* view if it is the target.
*
* @param event The motion event to be dispatched.
* @return True if the event was handled by the view, false otherwise.
*/
public boolean dispatchTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
// If the event should be handled by accessibility focus first.
if (event.isTargetAccessibilityFocus()) {
// We don't have focus or no virtual descendant has it, do not handle the event.
if (!isAccessibilityFocusedViewOrHost()) {
return false;
}
// We have focus and got the event, then use normal event dispatch.
event.setTargetAccessibilityFocus(false);
}
boolean result = false;
if (mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {
mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onTouchEvent(event, 0);
}
final int actionMasked = event.getActionMasked();
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN) {
// Defensive cleanup for new gesture
stopNestedScroll();
}
if (onFilterTouchEventForSecurity(event)) {
if ((mViewFlags & ENABLED_MASK) == ENABLED && handleScrollBarDragging(event)) {
result = true;
}
//noinspection SimplifiableIfStatement
ListenerInfo li = mListenerInfo;
if (li != null && li.mOnTouchListener != null
&& (mViewFlags & ENABLED_MASK) == ENABLED
&& li.mOnTouchListener.onTouch(this, event)) {
result = true;
}
if (!result && onTouchEvent(event)) {
result = true;
}
}
if (!result && mInputEventConsistencyVerifier != null) {
mInputEventConsistencyVerifier.onUnhandledEvent(event, 0);
}
// Clean up after nested scrolls if this is the end of a gesture;
// also cancel it if we tried an ACTION_DOWN but we didn't want the rest
// of the gesture.
if (actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_UP ||
actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL ||
(actionMasked == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN && !result)) {
stopNestedScroll();
}
return result;
}
```
-
分析：
-
代码量相对于ViewGroup的dispatchTouchEvnet()方法来说少很多。
-
主要是首先判断这个View本身有没有设置OnTouchListener监听，如果有，就直接跑去调用该接口下的onTouch()方法。该方法如果return true,这事件就是被消费掉了。return false,事件还是会传回给onTouchEvent()方法。
注意：值得注意的是，ViewGroup本身并没有重写View的onTouchEvnet()方法，所以这里如果回传，也是调用的父类View.java的onTouchEvent()方法。
-
2. onTouchEvent()方法源码分析
2.1 Activity的onTouchEvent()方法
- 源码：
/**
* Called when a touch screen event was not handled by any of the views
* under it. This is most useful to process touch events that happen
* outside of your window bounds, where there is no view to receive it.
*
* @param event The touch screen event being processed.
*
* @return Return true if you have consumed the event, false if you haven't.
* The default implementation always returns false.
*/
public boolean onTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
if (mWindow.shouldCloseOnTouch(this, event)) {
finish();
return true;
}
return false;
}
-
分析：
-
这个方法代码很少，默认Activity的onTouchEvent()方法是返回false的，也就是说默认不处理触摸事件。
-
只有在PhoneWindow的shouldCloseOnTouch（）方法返回true才会处理触摸事件，直接finish整个Activity.
-
2.2 View的onTouchEvent()方法
前面说了，ViewGroup没有重写View的onTouchEvent()方法，所以继承VIewGroup时，调用的还是View的onTouchEvent()。
- 源码：
/**
* Implement this method to handle touch screen motion events.
* <p>
* If this method is used to detect click actions, it is recommended that
* the actions be performed by implementing and calling
* {@link #performClick()}. This will ensure consistent system behavior,
* including:
* <ul>
* <li>obeying click sound preferences
* <li>dispatching OnClickListener calls
* <li>handling {@link AccessibilityNodeInfo#ACTION_CLICK ACTION_CLICK} when
* accessibility features are enabled
* </ul>
*
* @param event The motion event.
* @return True if the event was handled, false otherwise.
*/
public boolean onTouchEvent(MotionEvent event) {
final float x = event.getX();
final float y = event.getY();
final int viewFlags = mViewFlags;
final int action = event.getAction();
final boolean clickable = ((viewFlags & CLICKABLE) == CLICKABLE
|| (viewFlags & LONG_CLICKABLE) == LONG_CLICKABLE)
|| (viewFlags & CONTEXT_CLICKABLE) == CONTEXT_CLICKABLE;
if ((viewFlags & ENABLED_MASK) == DISABLED) {
if (action == MotionEvent.ACTION_UP && (mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PRESSED) != 0) {
setPressed(false);
}
mPrivateFlags3 &= ~PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
// A disabled view that is clickable still consumes the touch
// events, it just doesn't respond to them.
return clickable;
}
if (mTouchDelegate != null) {
if (mTouchDelegate.onTouchEvent(event)) {
return true;
}
}
if (clickable || (viewFlags & TOOLTIP) == TOOLTIP) {
switch (action) {
case MotionEvent.ACTION_UP:
mPrivateFlags3 &= ~PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
if ((viewFlags & TOOLTIP) == TOOLTIP) {
handleTooltipUp();
}
if (!clickable) {
removeTapCallback();
removeLongPressCallback();
mInContextButtonPress = false;
mHasPerformedLongPress = false;
mIgnoreNextUpEvent = false;
break;
}
boolean prepressed = (mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PREPRESSED) != 0;
if ((mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PRESSED) != 0 || prepressed) {
// take focus if we don't have it already and we should in
// touch mode.
boolean focusTaken = false;
if (isFocusable() && isFocusableInTouchMode() && !isFocused()) {
focusTaken = requestFocus();
}
if (prepressed) {
// The button is being released before we actually
// showed it as pressed. Make it show the pressed
// state now (before scheduling the click) to ensure
// the user sees it.
setPressed(true, x, y);
}
if (!mHasPerformedLongPress && !mIgnoreNextUpEvent) {
// This is a tap, so remove the longpress check
removeLongPressCallback();
// Only perform take click actions if we were in the pressed state
if (!focusTaken) {
// Use a Runnable and post this rather than calling
// performClick directly. This lets other visual state
// of the view update before click actions start.
if (mPerformClick == null) {
mPerformClick = new PerformClick();
}
if (!post(mPerformClick)) {
performClick();
}
}
}
if (mUnsetPressedState == null) {
mUnsetPressedState = new UnsetPressedState();
}
if (prepressed) {
postDelayed(mUnsetPressedState,
ViewConfiguration.getPressedStateDuration());
} else if (!post(mUnsetPressedState)) {
// If the post failed, unpress right now
mUnsetPressedState.run();
}
removeTapCallback();
}
mIgnoreNextUpEvent = false;
break;
case MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN:
if (event.getSource() == InputDevice.SOURCE_TOUCHSCREEN) {
mPrivateFlags3 |= PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
}
mHasPerformedLongPress = false;
if (!clickable) {
checkForLongClick(0, x, y);
break;
}
if (performButtonActionOnTouchDown(event)) {
break;
}
// Walk up the hierarchy to determine if we're inside a scrolling container.
boolean isInScrollingContainer = isInScrollingContainer();
// For views inside a scrolling container, delay the pressed feedback for
// a short period in case this is a scroll.
if (isInScrollingContainer) {
mPrivateFlags |= PFLAG_PREPRESSED;
if (mPendingCheckForTap == null) {
mPendingCheckForTap = new CheckForTap();
}
mPendingCheckForTap.x = event.getX();
mPendingCheckForTap.y = event.getY();
postDelayed(mPendingCheckForTap, ViewConfiguration.getTapTimeout());
} else {
// Not inside a scrolling container, so show the feedback right away
setPressed(true, x, y);
checkForLongClick(0, x, y);
}
break;
case MotionEvent.ACTION_CANCEL:
if (clickable) {
setPressed(false);
}
removeTapCallback();
removeLongPressCallback();
mInContextButtonPress = false;
mHasPerformedLongPress = false;
mIgnoreNextUpEvent = false;
mPrivateFlags3 &= ~PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
break;
case MotionEvent.ACTION_MOVE:
if (clickable) {
drawableHotspotChanged(x, y);
}
// Be lenient about moving outside of buttons
if (!pointInView(x, y, mTouchSlop)) {
// Outside button
// Remove any future long press/tap checks
removeTapCallback();
removeLongPressCallback();
if ((mPrivateFlags & PFLAG_PRESSED) != 0) {
setPressed(false);
}
mPrivateFlags3 &= ~PFLAG3_FINGER_DOWN;
}
break;
}
return true;
}
return false;
}
-
分析：
-
代码同样很长，那么我们只去理清主要的逻辑。
-
当事件传递到该方法处，首先会判断这个View是不是enabled状态，是不是clickable状态。
-
然后会根据Touch事件的类型做出不同的响应。比如View接收到Down事件和up事件等时候的表现效果。
注意：注意到一段比较重要的代码
if (!post(mPerformClick)) { performClick(); }
这段代码在判断是up事件之后调用了performClick()方法，这个方法回去回调onClickListener接口里面的onClick()方法。
这结合前面dispatchTouchEvent()方法中ACTION_DOWN事件会去调用onTouch，可见onTouch比onClick优先。 -
3. onInterceptTouchEvent()方法源码分析
只有ViewGroup有onInterceptTouchEvent()方法
- 源码：
public boolean onInterceptTouchEvent(MotionEvent ev) {
if (ev.isFromSource(InputDevice.SOURCE_MOUSE)
&& ev.getAction() == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
&& ev.isButtonPressed(MotionEvent.BUTTON_PRIMARY)
&& isOnScrollbarThumb(ev.getX(), ev.getY())) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
-
分析：
-
这个方法默认是返回false，表示不拦截触摸事件的。
-
只有在
ev.isFromSource(InputDevice.SOURCE_MOUSE)
&& ev.getAction() == MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN
&& ev.isButtonPressed(MotionEvent.BUTTON_PRIMARY)
&& isOnScrollbarThumb(ev.getX(), ev.getY())
这么多条件同时成立时才会拦截。
-
-
有需要的话，比如处理滑动冲突的时候，可以重写该方法，retrun true，拦截触摸事件。
注：【转载请注明，问题可提问，喜欢可打赏，博客持续更新，欢迎关注
