原汁原味英语听读

2019-06-26 What Dropping 17,000

2019-06-26  本文已影响2人  宁萌时光

听力来源:NPR,仅用于个人英语学习。
原文链接:https://www.npr.org/2019/06/20/734141432/what-dropping-17-000-wallets-around-the-globe-can-teach-us-about-honesty
小建议:请点击原文链接,聆听或下载本文音频。先花10分钟听两遍音频,再看对照文本,效果更佳。

What Dropping 17,000 Wallets Around The Globe Can Teach Us About Honesty

June 20, 2019

LULU GARCIA-NAVARRO, HOST: Picture this. You're a receptionist at, say, a hotel. Someone walks in and says they found a lost wallet, but they're in a hurry. They hand it to you. What would you do? Well, researchers have looked at that question using thousands of supposedly dropped wallets from all around the world. NPR's Merrit Kennedy has more on what they found.

MERRIT KENNEDY, BYLINE: The experiment started small. A research assistant in Finland pretending to be a tourist turned in a few wallets containing different amounts of money. He'd walk up to the counter of a big public place, like a bank or a post office.

ALAIN COHN: Acting as a tourist, he mentioned that he found the wallet outside around the corner. And then he asked the employees to take care of it.

KENNEDY: Alain Cohn from the University of Michigan says surveys show most people think more money in the wallet would make people less likely to return it. He even thought so. But actually, what they were seeing was the exact opposite.

COHN: People were more likely to return a wallet when it contained a higher amount of money. At first, we almost couldn't believe it and told him to triple the amount of money in the wallet. But yet again, we found the same puzzling finding.

KENNEDY: The researchers decided to do the experiment on a much larger scale. They dropped off more than 17,000 lost wallets in 40 countries. All of the wallets looked about the same - a small clear case with a few business cards, a grocery list and a key. Some had no money, and some had the local equivalent of about $13. And around the world, they kept finding the same thing. In 38 out of 40 countries, people were more likely to return the wallets with money. And in three countries, they dropped wallets containing nearly a hundred bucks. Cohn says the results were even more dramatic.

COHN: The highest reporting rate was found in the condition where the wallet included $100.

KENNEDY: So what's behind all this honesty? The researchers think there are two main explanations. First, just basic altruism.

COHN: Basically, if you don't return the wallet, you feel bad because you harmed another person.

KENNEDY: There's some evidence for that. They ran a test where just some wallets contained a key, only valuable to the person who lost it. Those wallets were about 10% more likely to be returned. Cohn says he also thinks the results have a lot to do with how people see themselves, and most people don't want to see themselves as a thief.

COHN: The more money the wallet contains, the more people say that it would feel like stealing if they do not return the wallet.

KENNEDY: The rates that wallets were returned varied a lot by country, even though money in the wallet almost always increased the chances. The researchers think the country's wealth is one factor, but a lot more research is needed to explain the differences. Duke University economist Dan Ariely studies dishonesty. He says this shows material benefits are not necessarily people's only motivation.

DAN ARIELY: We see that a lot of dishonesty is not about the cost-benefit analysis, not about what I stand to gain and what I stand to lose. But instead, it's about what we can rationalize. To what extent can we rationalize this particular behavior?

KENNEDY: Cohn says their study, which appears in the journal Science, suggests people are too pessimistic about the moral character of others.

COHN: I think it's a good reminder that other people might be more similar to you and not always assume the worst.

KENNEDY: And sometimes, honesty does pay. After people reported a lost wallet, they got to keep the cash. Merrit Kennedy, NPR News.

知识点笔记

1.dramatic:戏剧性的
e.g.1.These are all very dramatic career changes.
2.Oh, sorry. Things were just getting so dramatic.

2.altruism:利他、无私后面描述了这种行为 "Basically, if you don't return the wallet, you feel bad because you harmed another person."
e.g.But we can all learn to adapt traits that would make us more resilient, like optimism and altruism.

3.not necessarily: possibly, but not certainly.
e.g.1.That is not necessarily true.
2.Expensive restaurants aren't necessarily the best.
3.Having this disease does not necessarily mean that you will die young.

4."We see that a lot of dishonesty is not about the cost-benefit analysis, not about what I stand to gain and what I stand to lose. But instead, it's about what we can rationalize. To what extent can we rationalize this particular behavior?"研究人员对于人们行为的分析。

5.The researcher said maybe we can be more optimistic about moral character of others:
"I think it's a good reminder that other people might be more similar to you and not always assume the worst."

6.And sometimes, honesty does pay.
pay: if a particular action pays, it brings a good result or advantage for you 回报,后一句解释了"After people reported a lost wallet, they got to keep the cash."(在详细的文章中介绍了因为这是一项实验,实验者已经离开了当地,就让拾金不昧的好心人自己留着钱。)
e.g.1.Crime doesn't pay.
2.It pays to get some professional advice before you make a decision.
3.It would pay you to ask if there are any jobs going at the London office.
4.Getting some qualifications now will pay dividends (=bring a lot of advantages) in the long term.

上一篇 下一篇

猜你喜欢

热点阅读