ASM统一线程池

2021-11-19 本文已影响0人折剑游侠

统一项目中的线程池，Executors封装的几个线程池比较好操作，就以此为切入点了。闲话不多说，开始撸。

几个静态方法ThreadUtil

public class ThreadUtil {
    private static final int coreSize = Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors() + 1;

    private static final ExecutorService fix = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(coreSize);
    private static final ExecutorService single = Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor();
    private static final ExecutorService cache = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
    private static final ExecutorService scheduled = Executors.newScheduledThreadPool(coreSize);

    public static ExecutorService threadPool() {
        return cache;
    }
}

准备将项目中所有的线程池替换成上面的cache，写个threadPool()静态方法供asm替换。

老样子ThreadClassVisitor

class ThreadClassVisitor(classVisitor: ClassVisitor) : ClassVisitor(Opcodes.ASM9, classVisitor) {

    override fun visitMethod(
        access: Int,
        name: String?,
        descriptor: String?,
        signature: String?,
        exceptions: Array<out String>?
    ): MethodVisitor {
        val mv = cv.visitMethod(access, name, descriptor, signature, exceptions)
        return ThreadMethodVisitor(mv, access, name, descriptor)
    }
}

ThreadMethodVisitor重写visitMethodInsn()方法。

object ThreadMethodVisitor {

    operator fun invoke(
        mv: MethodVisitor,
        access: Int,
        name: String?,
        descriptor: String?,
    ): MethodVisitor {
        return object : AdviceAdapter(Opcodes.ASM9, mv, access, name, descriptor) {

            override fun visitMethodInsn(
                opcode: Int,
                owner: String?,
                name: String?,
                descriptor: String?,
                isInterface: Boolean
            ) {
                super.visitMethodInsn(opcode, owner, name, descriptor, isInterface)
            }
        }
    }
}

visitMethodInsn()中根据参数判断是否是Executors.newCachedThreadPool()等创建线程池的方法。这里多说一嘴，站在字节码的角度看，owner、name、descriptor就可以确定是哪个类的方法。以Executors此为例，看看字节码。图方便，直接对上述ThreadUtil.class文件使用ASM Bytecode Viewer插件。

ThreadUtil.class
先看字节码Bytecode

    GETSTATIC com/chenxuan/hook/ThreadUtil.coreSize : I
    INVOKESTATIC java/util/concurrent/Executors.newFixedThreadPool (I)Ljava/util/concurrent/ExecutorService;
    PUTSTATIC com/chenxuan/hook/ThreadUtil.fix : Ljava/util/concurrent/ExecutorService;

    INVOKESTATIC java/util/concurrent/Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor ()Ljava/util/concurrent/ExecutorService;
    PUTSTATIC com/chenxuan/hook/ThreadUtil.singe : Ljava/util/concurrent/ExecutorService;

    INVOKESTATIC java/util/concurrent/Executors.newCachedThreadPool ()Ljava/util/concurrent/ExecutorService;
    PUTSTATIC com/chenxuan/hook/ThreadUtil.cache : Ljava/util/concurrent/ExecutorService;

    GETSTATIC com/chenxuan/hook/ThreadUtil.coreSize : I
    INVOKESTATIC java/util/concurrent/Executors.newScheduledThreadPool (I)Ljava/util/concurrent/ScheduledExecutorService;
    PUTSTATIC com/chenxuan/hook/ThreadUtil.scheduled : Ljava/util/concurrent/ExecutorService;

对应看asm api ASMmified

            methodVisitor.visitFieldInsn(GETSTATIC, "com/chenxuan/hook/ThreadUtil", "coreSize", "I");
            methodVisitor.visitMethodInsn(INVOKESTATIC, "java/util/concurrent/Executors", "newFixedThreadPool", "(I)Ljava/util/concurrent/ExecutorService;", false);
            methodVisitor.visitFieldInsn(PUTSTATIC, "com/chenxuan/hook/ThreadUtil", "fix", "Ljava/util/concurrent/ExecutorService;")

            methodVisitor.visitMethodInsn(INVOKESTATIC, "java/util/concurrent/Executors", "newSingleThreadExecutor", "()Ljava/util/concurrent/ExecutorService;", false);
            methodVisitor.visitFieldInsn(PUTSTATIC, "com/chenxuan/hook/ThreadUtil", "singe", "Ljava/util/concurrent/ExecutorService;");

            methodVisitor.visitMethodInsn(INVOKESTATIC, "java/util/concurrent/Executors", "newCachedThreadPool", "()Ljava/util/concurrent/ExecutorService;", false);
            methodVisitor.visitFieldInsn(PUTSTATIC, "com/chenxuan/hook/ThreadUtil", "cache", "Ljava/util/concurrent/ExecutorService;");

            methodVisitor.visitFieldInsn(GETSTATIC, "com/chenxuan/hook/ThreadUtil", "coreSize", "I");
            methodVisitor.visitMethodInsn(INVOKESTATIC, "java/util/concurrent/Executors", "newScheduledThreadPool", "(I)Ljava/util/concurrent/ScheduledExecutorService;", false);
            methodVisitor.visitFieldInsn(PUTSTATIC, "com/chenxuan/hook/ThreadUtil", "scheduled", "Ljava/util/concurrent/ExecutorService;");

很清晰了：

opcode->INVOKESTATIC 静态方法
owner->java/util/concurrent/Executors 所属类
name->newCachedThreadPool 方法名
descriptor->()Ljava/util/concurrent/ExecutorService 方法参数和返回值
isInterface->false 是否接口方法

为了方便匹配这几个方法和做替换，建一个实体类ThreadMethod描述方法模型。

data class ThreadMethod(
    var opcode: Int = Opcodes.INVOKESTATIC,
    var owner: String?,
    var name: String?,
    var descriptor: String?,
    var isInterface: Boolean = false
) {
    fun equalThreadMethod(
        opcode: Int,
        owner: String?,
        name: String?,
        descriptor: String?
    ) =
        this.opcode == opcode && this.owner == owner && this.name == name && this.descriptor == descriptor
}

写个equalThreadMethod()方法匹配visitMethodInsn传过来的参数，还需要一个集合threadMethods保存Executors的几个静态方法。

internal val threadMethods = mutableListOf<ThreadMethod>().apply {
    add(
        ThreadMethod(
            owner = "java/util/concurrent/Executors",
            name = "newCachedThreadPool",
            descriptor = "()Ljava/util/concurrent/ExecutorService;"
        )
    )
}

偷个懒，先匹配Executors.newCachedThreadPool()，接下来在visitMethodInsn中判断并替换为自定义的线程池。

object ThreadMethodVisitor {

    operator fun invoke(
        mv: MethodVisitor,
        access: Int,
        name: String?,
        descriptor: String?,
    ): MethodVisitor {
        return object : AdviceAdapter(Opcodes.ASM9, mv, access, name, descriptor) {

            override fun visitMethodInsn(
                opcode: Int,
                owner: String?,
                name: String?,
                descriptor: String?,
                isInterface: Boolean
            ) {
                if (containsThread(opcode, owner, name, descriptor)) {
                    //替换
                    super.visitMethodInsn(opcode, owner, name, descriptor, isInterface)
                } else {
                    super.visitMethodInsn(opcode, owner, name, descriptor, isInterface)
                }
            }
        }
    }

    private fun containsThread(
        opcode: Int,
        owner: String?,
        name: String?,
        descriptor: String?
    ): Boolean {
        threadMethods.forEach {
            if (it.equalThreadMethod(opcode, owner, name, descriptor)) {
                return true
            }
        }
        return false
    }
}

替换的方法直接在这里写死也不太好，用ThreadMethod包装一下

internal val realThreadMethod = ThreadMethod(
    owner = "com/chenxuan/hook/ThreadUtil",
    name = "threadPool",
    descriptor = "()Ljava/util/concurrent/ExecutorService;"
)

修改visitMethodInsn()替换处

object ThreadMethodVisitor {

    operator fun invoke(
        mv: MethodVisitor,
        access: Int,
        name: String?,
        descriptor: String?,
    ): MethodVisitor {
        return object : AdviceAdapter(Opcodes.ASM9, mv, access, name, descriptor) {

            override fun visitMethodInsn(
                opcode: Int,
                owner: String?,
                name: String?,
                descriptor: String?,
                isInterface: Boolean
            ) {
                if (containsThread(opcode, owner, name, descriptor)) {
                    super.visitMethodInsn(
                        realThreadMethod.opcode,
                        realThreadMethod.owner,
                        realThreadMethod.name,
                        realThreadMethod.descriptor,
                        realThreadMethod.isInterface
                    )
                } else {
                    super.visitMethodInsn(opcode, owner, name, descriptor, isInterface)
                }
            }
        }
    }

    private fun containsThread(
        opcode: Int,
        owner: String?,
        name: String?,
        descriptor: String?
    ): Boolean {
        threadMethods.forEach {
            if (it.equalThreadMethod(opcode, owner, name, descriptor)) {
                return true
            }
        }
        return false
    }
}

跑个测试用例MainActivity，build。

class MainActivity : AppCompatActivity() {
    override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
        super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
        setContentView(R.layout.activity_main)
        trackMethod()
        loadPic()
        hookThread()
    }

    private fun hookThread() {
        val cache = Executors.newCachedThreadPool()
    }

    private fun loadPic() {
        Glide
            .with(this)
            .load("https://pic.3gbizhi.com/2014/0430/20140430043839656.jpg")
            .into(findViewById(R.id.ivAvatar))
    }

    @Track
    private fun trackMethod() {
        val data = mutableListOf<String>()
    }
}

查看transform下处理过的MainActivity并反编译成Java，关注hookThread()就好。

MainActivity

成功替换为ThreadUtil.threadPool()。后续补充threadMethods将其它几个静态方法添加进去，当然还有ThreadPoolExecutor构造方法，收敛所有创建线程池的方法，然后还有new Thread之类的写法处理到cacheThreadPool中基本就ok了。还可以增加白名单，并非所有线程池都需要替换。感觉吧，asm确实是可以为所欲为啊。

ASM统一线程池

猜你喜欢

热点阅读