【金融】Eco.252-Lec.02

2017-05-22  本文已影响10人  苏尚君

not just few big events in stories, which is not helpful to understand the crisis, while the accumulation of many little events according to laws of probability are more important

some basic concepts like variance, etc., and idiosyncratic risk, systematic risk

interpretations of the crisis:

1. Basic concept: Return(投资[净]回报[率]?)

2. Statistical concepts

2.1 Central tendency: Average, Mean

2.2 Risk: Variance, Standard Deviation

Qustion:

Are the shocks that affected the markets independent, or somehow related?

2.3 Law of Large numbers(LLN)

3. Core concept of finance and insurance: Value of Risk(VaR)

"5% prob to lose $10 billion a year"

what brought us the crisis is the calculations are TOO OPTIMISTIC!(many people calculate the VaR together)

Return of some company = market returns + idiosyncratic returns

market returns = beta * (return of S&P 500), where beta can be gotton using least squares applied on scatter plots, whose axes are the S&P 500 and this company

4. Fat-tailed distribution, instead of normal distribution

people assumes that the price of stocks behave like normal distribution, while in fact sometimes the assumptions fails and it behave like the fat-tailed distribution, e.g. Cauchy distribution, where the probalbility is higher of being far out than it is in normal distribution

such situations really happened in history

5. RECAP

Independence leads to law of large numbers, and it leads to some sort of stability, either independence throught time or across stocks.

fat-tailed distribution matters, which will fool you so that you get big incredible shocks you thought couldn't happen.

上一篇 下一篇

猜你喜欢

热点阅读