多线程

2020-04-25  本文已影响0人  雪国落叶

先看下Thread类中之前没有太多关注的类定义:

public
class Thread implements Runnable {
    /* Make sure registerNatives is the first thing <clinit> does. */

    /**
     * The synchronization object responsible for this thread's join/sleep/park operations.
     */
    private final Object lock = new Object();

    private volatile long nativePeer;
/* ThreadLocal values pertaining to this thread. This map is maintained
     * by the ThreadLocal class. */
    ThreadLocal.ThreadLocalMap threadLocals = null;

    /*
     * InheritableThreadLocal values pertaining to this thread. This map is
     * maintained by the InheritableThreadLocal class.
     */
    ThreadLocal.ThreadLocalMap inheritableThreadLocals = null;

public final void join(long millis) throws InterruptedException {
        synchronized(lock) {
        long base = System.currentTimeMillis();
        long now = 0;

        if (millis < 0) {
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("timeout value is negative");
        }

        if (millis == 0) {
            while (isAlive()) {
                lock.wait(0);
            }
        } else {
            while (isAlive()) {
                long delay = millis - now;
                if (delay <= 0) {
                    break;
                }
                lock.wait(delay);
                now = System.currentTimeMillis() - base;
            }
        }
        }
    }

join

从上面看到实际上检测isAlive,因此线程未开始执行时,是不生效的;
关键点调用了lock.wait函数,那么在哪里notifyAll()呢?
在线程将要退出的时候,要查看jvm中的实现
ensure_join方法中,调用 lock.notify_all(thread); 唤醒所有等待thread锁的线程。

void JavaThread::run() {
  ...
  thread_main_inner();
}

void JavaThread::thread_main_inner() {
  ...
  this->exit(false);
  delete this;
}

void JavaThread::exit(bool destroy_vm, ExitType exit_type) {
  ...
  // Notify waiters on thread object. This has to be done after exit() is called
  // on the thread (if the thread is the last thread in a daemon ThreadGroup the
  // group should have the destroyed bit set before waiters are notified).
  ensure_join(this);
  ...
}

static void ensure_join(JavaThread* thread) {
  // We do not need to grap the Threads_lock, since we are operating on ourself.
  Handle threadObj(thread, thread->threadObj());
  assert(threadObj.not_null(), "java thread object must exist");
  ObjectLocker lock(threadObj, thread);
  // Ignore pending exception (ThreadDeath), since we are exiting anyway
  thread->clear_pending_exception();
  // Thread is exiting. So set thread_status field in  java.lang.Thread class to TERMINATED.
  java_lang_Thread::set_thread_status(threadObj(), java_lang_Thread::TERMINATED);
  // Clear the native thread instance - this makes isAlive return false and allows the join()
  // to complete once we've done the notify_all below
  java_lang_Thread::set_thread(threadObj(), NULL);
  lock.notify_all(thread);
  // Ignore pending exception (ThreadDeath), since we are exiting anyway
  thread->clear_pending_exception();
}

final线程安全

而final可以防止此类事情的发生:如果某个成员是final的,JVM规范做出如下明确的保证:一旦对象引用对其他线程可见,则其final成员也必须正确的赋值了。

volatile

上一篇下一篇

猜你喜欢

热点阅读