Android插件化实现原理
2019-06-30 本文已影响0人
SimpleFunc
2016-04-18 15:00
最近android插件化比较火热，陆陆续续出了好多插件化方案，大有百花齐放之势。
其实android实现方式就两种，要么hook AMS(ActivityManagerService),要么hook Instrumentation。想要详细了解hook的原理，先要弄清楚Activity的启动流程
Activity启动流程
启动一个activity：
Intent intent = new Intent(ActivityA.this,ActivityB.class);
startActivity(intent);
通过调用Activity的startActivity方法来启动另一个Activity. 而startActivity继承自ContextThemeWrapper。看Wrapper后缀就知道这只是一个封装类。真正的逻辑在ContextImpl中
@Override
public void startActivity(Intent intent, Bundle options) {
warnIfCallingFromSystemProcess();
if ((intent.getFlags()&Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK) == 0) {
throw new AndroidRuntimeException(
"Calling startActivity() from outside of an Activity "
+ " context requires the FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK flag."
+ " Is this really what you want?");
}
mMainThread.getInstrumentation().execStartActivity(
getOuterContext(), mMainThread.getApplicationThread(), null,
(Activity)null, intent, -1, options);
}
通过MainThread获取到Instrumentation对象，Instrumentation对象类似Activiy的管家，所有对Activity的操作都通过它去执行。然后调用它的execStartActivity方法来执行启动activity
public ActivityResult execStartActivity(Context who, IBinder contextThread, IBinder token, Activity target,
Intent intent, int requestCode, Bundle options) {
IApplicationThread whoThread = (IApplicationThread) contextThread;
...
try {
intent.migrateExtraStreamToClipData();
intent.prepareToLeaveProcess();
int result = ActivityManagerNative.getDefault()
.startActivity(whoThread, who.getBasePackageName(), intent,
intent.resolveTypeIfNeeded(who.getContentResolver()),
token, target != null ? target.mEmbeddedID : null,
requestCode, 0, null, options);
checkStartActivityResult(result, intent);
} catch (RemoteException e) {
}
return null;
}
调用ActivityManagerNative.getDefault()获取一个ActivityManagerNative对象，然后调用来该对象的startActivity方法。
而ActivityManagerNative对象继承自Binder，所以ActivityManagerNative是可以跨进程通信的。
ActivityManagerNative跨入到了ActivityManagerService，简称AMS。是ActivityManagerNative的实现，运行在Android内核进程。
AMS的startActivity：
@Override
public final int startActivity(IApplicationThread caller, String callingPackage,
Intent intent, String resolvedType, IBinder resultTo,
String resultWho, int requestCode, int startFlags,
String profileFile, ParcelFileDescriptor profileFd, Bundle options) {
return startActivityAsUser(caller, callingPackage, intent, resolvedType, resultTo,
resultWho, requestCode,
startFlags, profileFile, profileFd, options, UserHandle.getCallingUserId());
}
调用了startActivityAsUser方法，startActivityAsUser又调用了ActivityStackSupervisor.startActivityMayWait方法：
final int startActivityMayWait(IApplicationThread caller, int callingUid,String callingPackage, Intent intent, String resolvedType, IBinder resultTo,String resultWho, int requestCode, int startFlags, String profileFile,
ParcelFileDescriptor profileFd, WaitResult outResult, Configuration config,Bundle options, int userId) {
..........//权限判断
int res = startActivityLocked(caller, intent, resolvedType,aInfo, resultTo, resultWho, requestCode, callingPid, callingUid,callingPackage, startFlags, options, componentSpecified, null);
.........
}
}
调用startActivityLocked之后，然后是和ActivityStack的调用，主要处理activity栈的逻辑。然后调用到realStartActivityLocked方法
final boolean realStartActivityLocked(ActivityRecord r,ProcessRecord app, boolean andResume, boolean checkConfig)
throws RemoteException {
r.startFreezingScreenLocked(app, 0);
if (false) Slog.d(TAG, "realStartActivity: setting app visibility true");
mWindowManager.setAppVisibility(r.appToken, true);
r.startLaunchTickingLocked();
if (checkConfig) {
Configuration config = mWindowManager.updateOrientationFromAppTokens(
mService.mConfiguration,
r.mayFreezeScreenLocked(app) ? r.appToken : null);
mService.updateConfigurationLocked(config, r, false, false);
}
r.app = app;
app.waitingToKill = null;
r.launchCount++;
r.lastLaunchTime = SystemClock.uptimeMillis();
if (localLOGV) Slog.v(TAG, "Launching: " + r);
int idx = app.activities.indexOf(r);
if (idx < 0) {
app.activities.add(r);
}
mService.updateLruProcessLocked(app, true, true);
final ActivityStack stack = r.task.stack;
try {
if (app.thread == null) {
throw new RemoteException();
}
List<ResultInfo> results = null;
List<Intent> newIntents = null;
if (andResume) {
results = r.results;
newIntents = r.newIntents;
}
if (DEBUG_SWITCH) Slog.v(TAG, "Launching: " + r
+ " icicle=" + r.icicle
+ " with results=" + results + " newIntents=" + newIntents
+ " andResume=" + andResume);
if (andResume) {
EventLog.writeEvent(EventLogTags.AM_RESTART_ACTIVITY,
r.userId, System.identityHashCode(r),
r.task.taskId, r.shortComponentName);
}
if (r.isHomeActivity() && r.isNotResolverActivity()) {
// Home process is the root process of the task.
mService.mHomeProcess = r.task.mActivities.get(0).app;
}
mService.ensurePackageDexOpt(r.intent.getComponent().getPackageName());
r.sleeping = false;
r.forceNewConfig = false;
mService.showAskCompatModeDialogLocked(r);
r.compat = mService.compatibilityInfoForPackageLocked(r.info.applicationInfo);
String profileFile = null;
ParcelFileDescriptor profileFd = null;
boolean profileAutoStop = false;
if (mService.mProfileApp != null && mService.mProfileApp.equals(app.processName)) {
if (mService.mProfileProc == null || mService.mProfileProc == app) {
mService.mProfileProc = app;
profileFile = mService.mProfileFile;
profileFd = mService.mProfileFd;
profileAutoStop = mService.mAutoStopProfiler;
}
}
app.hasShownUi = true;
app.pendingUiClean = true;
if (profileFd != null) {
try {
profileFd = profileFd.dup();
} catch (IOException e) {
if (profileFd != null) {
try {
profileFd.close();
} catch (IOException o) {
}
profileFd = null;
}
}
}
app.forceProcessStateUpTo(ActivityManager.PROCESS_STATE_TOP);
app.thread.scheduleLaunchActivity(new Intent(r.intent), r.appToken,
System.identityHashCode(r), r.info,
new Configuration(mService.mConfiguration), r.compat,
app.repProcState, r.icicle, results, newIntents, !andResume,
mService.isNextTransitionForward(), profileFile, profileFd,
profileAutoStop);
if ((app.info.flags&ApplicationInfo.FLAG_CANT_SAVE_STATE) != 0) {
if (app.processName.equals(app.info.packageName)) {
if (mService.mHeavyWeightProcess != null
&& mService.mHeavyWeightProcess != app) {
Slog.w(TAG, "Starting new heavy weight process " + app
+ " when already running "
+ mService.mHeavyWeightProcess);
}
mService.mHeavyWeightProcess = app;
Message msg = mService.mHandler.obtainMessage(
ActivityManagerService.POST_HEAVY_NOTIFICATION_MSG);
msg.obj = r;
mService.mHandler.sendMessage(msg);
}
}
} catch (RemoteException e) {
if (r.launchFailed) {
// This is the second time we failed -- finish activity
// and give up.
Slog.e(TAG, "Second failure launching "
+ r.intent.getComponent().flattenToShortString()
+ ", giving up", e);
mService.appDiedLocked(app, app.pid, app.thread);
stack.requestFinishActivityLocked(r.appToken, Activity.RESULT_CANCELED, null,
"2nd-crash", false);
return false;
}
// This is the first time we failed -- restart process and
// retry.
app.activities.remove(r);
throw e;
}
r.launchFailed = false;
if (stack.updateLRUListLocked(r)) {
Slog.w(TAG, "Activity " + r
+ " being launched, but already in LRU list");
}
if (andResume) {
stack.minimalResumeActivityLocked(r);
} else {
if (DEBUG_STATES) Slog.v(TAG, "Moving to STOPPED: " + r
+ " (starting in stopped state)");
r.state = ActivityState.STOPPED;
r.stopped = true;
}
if (isFrontStack(stack)) {
mService.startSetupActivityLocked();
}
return true;
}
方法比较长，重点的部分是
app.thread.scheduleLaunchActivity(new Intent(r.intent), r.appToken,
System.identityHashCode(r), r.info,
new Configuration(mService.mConfiguration), r.compat,
app.repProcState, r.icicle, results, newIntents, !andResume,
mService.isNextTransitionForward(), profileFile, profileFd,
profileAutoStop);
调用了ApplicationThread的scheduleLaunchActivity方法，ApplicationThread也是binder,实现了IApplicationThread接口。
在Instrumentation调用了AMS的startActivity方法之后的逻辑都是在系统进程中进行的，启动完Activity之后自然需要回归到当初的app进程。这也是跨进程操作，自然需要binder。
scheduleLaunchActivity方法：
public final void scheduleLaunchActivity(Intent intent, IBinder token, int ident,ActivityInfo info, Configuration curConfig, CompatibilityInfo compatInfo,int procState, Bundle state, List<ResultInfo> pendingResults,List<Intent> pendingNewIntents, boolean notResumed, boolean isForward,String profileName, ParcelFileDescriptor profileFd, boolean autoStopProfiler) {
updateProcessState(procState, false);
ActivityClientRecord r = new ActivityClientRecord();
r.token = token;
r.ident = ident;
r.intent = intent;
r.activityInfo = info;
r.compatInfo = compatInfo;
r.state = state;
r.pendingResults = pendingResults;
r.pendingIntents = pendingNewIntents;
r.startsNotResumed = notResumed;
r.isForward = isForward;
r.profileFile = profileName;
r.profileFd = profileFd;
r.autoStopProfiler = autoStopProfiler;
updatePendingConfiguration(curConfig);
queueOrSendMessage(H.LAUNCH_ACTIVITY, r);
}
可以看到，最后调用了queueOrSendMessage(H.LAUNCH_ACTIVITY, r)。
H是一个handler,queueOrSendMessage方法其实就是通过hander去发送一个message。
handle message:
public void handleMessage(Message msg) {
if (DEBUG_MESSAGES) Slog.v(TAG, ">>> handling: " + codeToString(msg.what));
switch (msg.what) {
case LAUNCH_ACTIVITY: {
Trace.traceBegin(Trace.TRACE_TAG_ACTIVITY_MANAGER, "activityStart");
ActivityClientRecord r = (ActivityClientRecord)msg.obj;
r.packageInfo = getPackageInfoNoCheck(
r.activityInfo.applicationInfo, r.compatInfo);
handleLaunchActivity(r, null);
Trace.traceEnd(Trace.TRACE_TAG_ACTIVITY_MANAGER);
} break;
..........
}
通过message调用了handleLaunchActivity方法，接着在handleLaunchActivity方法中调用了performLaunchActivity来启动一个activity
private Activity performLaunchActivity(ActivityClientRecord r, Intent customIntent) {
....
Activity activity = null;
try {
java.lang.ClassLoader cl = r.packageInfo.getClassLoader();
activity = mInstrumentation.newActivity(
cl, component.getClassName(), r.intent);
StrictMode.incrementExpectedActivityCount(activity.getClass());
r.intent.setExtrasClassLoader(cl);
if (r.state != null) {
r.state.setClassLoader(cl);
}
} catch (Exception e) {
if (!mInstrumentation.onException(activity, e)) {
throw new RuntimeException(
"Unable to instantiate activity " + component
+ ": " + e.toString(), e);
}
}
......
return activity;
}
又调用了Instrumentation的newActivity方法去创建一个Activity.
总结下：
- 通过activity去调用startActivity方法，其实是调用的ContextImpl的同名方法
- 在ContextImpl获取到Instrumentation，然后通过Instrumentation的execStartActivity继续启动
- Instrumentation跨进程通信，调用到AMS的startActivity
- AMS处理权限和ActivityStack的逻辑
- 通过ApplicationThread跨进程，回到app进程
- 通过ActivityThread中的handler传递启动activity的消息
- 最终调用Instrumentation的newActivity方法创建一个Activity对象
其实其它组件如Service 调用过程和Activity的大同小异，都是跨进程和AMS，WMS或者PMS进行通信。然后通过ApplicationThread回到app进程，最后通过handler传递消息。
如果要启动一个未事先声明的Activity，在AMS的权限校验的时候会验证不过。
startActivityMayWait方法
if (err == ActivityManager.START_SUCCESS && aInfo == null) {
// We couldn't find the specific class specified in the Intent.
// Also the end of the line.
err = ActivityManager.START_CLASS_NOT_FOUND;
}
if (err != ActivityManager.START_SUCCESS) {
if (resultRecord != null) {
resultStack.sendActivityResultLocked(-1,
resultRecord, resultWho, requestCode,
Activity.RESULT_CANCELED, null);
}
setDismissKeyguard(false);
ActivityOptions.abort(options);
return err;
}
找不到对应的类就会直接抛出错误。所以要解决插件化的核心为题就是让没有在manifst中注册的activity顺利启动起来。
由于系统进程无法hook，所有只能通过欺骗的方法，现在manifst中声明几个Activity来占坑，在校验权限之前将实际的activity改为占坑的activity，通过校验之后再替换回来。
要想实现上面欺骗的逻辑，有两种选择：hook Instrumentation 或 hook AMS
hook Instrumentation
这部分代码来自smail
@Override
public void setUp(Context context) {
super.setUp(context);
// Inject instrumentation
if (sHostInstrumentation == null) {
try {
final Class<?> activityThreadClass = Class.forName("android.app.ActivityThread");
final Method method = activityThreadClass.getMethod("currentActivityThread");
Object thread = method.invoke(null, (Object[]) null);
Field field = activityThreadClass.getDeclaredField("mInstrumentation");
field.setAccessible(true);
sHostInstrumentation = (Instrumentation) field.get(thread);
Instrumentation wrapper = new InstrumentationWrapper();
field.set(thread, wrapper);
if (context instanceof Activity) {
field = Activity.class.getDeclaredField("mInstrumentation");
field.setAccessible(true);
field.set(context, wrapper);
}
} catch (Exception ignored) {
ignored.printStackTrace();
// Usually, cannot reach here
}
}
}
通过反射ActivityThread来获取到Instrumentation field。然后将系统的Instrumentation替换成为自己的InstrumentationWrapper。
然后在InstrumentationWrapper中重写execStartActivity和newActivty这两个方法
/** @Override V21+
* Wrap activity from REAL to STUB */
public ActivityResult execStartActivity(
Context who, IBinder contextThread, IBinder token, Activity target,
Intent intent, int requestCode, android.os.Bundle options) {
wrapIntent(intent);
return ReflectAccelerator.execStartActivityV21(sHostInstrumentation,
who, contextThread, token, target, intent, requestCode, options);
}
/** @Override V20-
* Wrap activity from REAL to STUB */
public ActivityResult execStartActivity(
Context who, IBinder contextThread, IBinder token, Activity target,
Intent intent, int requestCode) {
wrapIntent(intent);
return ReflectAccelerator.execStartActivityV20(sHostInstrumentation,
wrapIntent方法：
private void wrapIntent(Intent intent) {
ComponentName component = intent.getComponent();
if (component == null) return; // ignore system intent
String realClazz = intent.getComponent().getClassName();
if (sLoadedActivities == null) return;
ActivityInfo ai = sLoadedActivities.get(realClazz);
if (ai == null) return;
// Carry the real(plugin) class for incoming `newActivity' method.
intent.addCategory(REDIRECT_FLAG + realClazz);
String stubClazz = dequeueStubActivity(ai, realClazz);
intent.setComponent(new ComponentName(Small.getContext(), stubClazz));
}
这个方法先获取了真正的Activity的信息，并且保存起来。然后通过dequeueStubActivity方法生成一个占坑的activity
private String dequeueStubActivity(ActivityInfo ai, String realActivityClazz) {
if (ai.launchMode == ActivityInfo.LAUNCH_MULTIPLE) {
// In standard mode, the stub activity is reusable.
return STUB_ACTIVITY_PREFIX;
}
int availableId = -1;
int stubId = -1;
int countForMode = STUB_ACTIVITIES_COUNT;
int countForAll = countForMode * 3; // 3=[singleTop, singleTask, singleInstance]
if (mStubQueue == null) {
// Lazy init
mStubQueue = new String[countForAll];
}
int offset = (ai.launchMode - 1) * countForMode;
for (int i = 0; i < countForMode; i++) {
String usedActivityClazz = mStubQueue[i + offset];
if (usedActivityClazz == null) {
if (availableId == -1) availableId = i;
} else if (usedActivityClazz.equals(realActivityClazz)) {
stubId = i;
}
}
if (stubId != -1) {
availableId = stubId;
} else if (availableId != -1) {
mStubQueue[availableId + offset] = realActivityClazz;
} else {
// TODO:
Log.e(TAG, "Launch mode " + ai.launchMode + " is full");
}
return STUB_ACTIVITY_PREFIX + ai.launchMode + availableId;
}
据真正的Activity的launchMode等信息生成一个占坑Activity，而这些占坑Activity都声明在manifest中
<application>
<!-- Stub Activities -->
<!-- 1 standard mode -->
<activity android:name=".A" android:launchMode="standard"/>
<!-- 4 singleTask mode -->
<activity android:name=".A10" android:launchMode="singleTask"/>
<activity android:name=".A11" android:launchMode="singleTask"/>
<activity android:name=".A12" android:launchMode="singleTask"/>
<activity android:name=".A13" android:launchMode="singleTask"/>
<!-- 4 singleTop mode -->
<activity android:name=".A20" android:launchMode="singleTop"/>
<activity android:name=".A21" android:launchMode="singleTop"/>
<activity android:name=".A22" android:launchMode="singleTop"/>
<activity android:name=".A23" android:launchMode="singleTop"/>
<!-- 4 singleInstance mode -->
<activity android:name=".A30" android:launchMode="singleInstance"/>
<activity android:name=".A31" android:launchMode="singleInstance"/>
<activity android:name=".A32" android:launchMode="singleInstance"/>
<activity android:name=".A33" android:launchMode="singleInstance"/>
<!-- Web Activity -->
<activity android:name=".webkit.WebActivity"
android:screenOrientation="portrait"
android:windowSoftInputMode="stateHidden|adjustPan"/>
<!--<service android:name="net.wequick.small.service.UpgradeService"-->
<!--android:exported="false"/>-->
</application>
这样就将真的activity转化成来一个占坑的activity。可以通过权限校验了。
newActivity：
@Override
/** Unwrap activity from STUB to REAL */
public Activity newActivity(ClassLoader cl, String className, Intent intent)
throws InstantiationException, IllegalAccessException, ClassNotFoundException {
// Stub -> Real
if (!className.startsWith(STUB_ACTIVITY_PREFIX)) {
return super.newActivity(cl, className, intent);
}
className = unwrapIntent(intent, className);
Activity activity = super.newActivity(cl, className, intent);
return activity;
}
private String unwrapIntent(Intent intent, String className) {
Set<String> categories = intent.getCategories();
if (categories == null) return className;
// Get plugin activity class name from categories
Iterator<String> it = categories.iterator();
String realClazz = null;
while (it.hasNext()) {
String category = it.next();
if (category.charAt(0) == REDIRECT_FLAG) {
realClazz = category.substring(1);
break;
}
}
if (realClazz == null) return className;
return realClazz;
}
通过unwrapIntent获取真正的Activity并且调用父类（Instrumentation）的newActivity方法来生成真正的activity。这样就成功地完成来欺骗过程。
hook ActivityManagerNative
下面的代码来自DroidPlugin
主要的是IActivityManagerHook类，它继承自ProxyHook
public abstract class ProxyHook extends Hook implements InvocationHandler {
public Object invoke(Object proxy, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable {
try {
if (!isEnable()) {
return method.invoke(mOldObj, args);
}
HookedMethodHandler hookedMethodHandler = mHookHandles.getHookedMethodHandler(method);
if (hookedMethodHandler != null) {
return hookedMethodHandler.doHookInner(mOldObj, method, args);
}
return method.invoke(mOldObj, args);
}
...........
}
ProxyHook是一个动态代理实现类，通过动态代理获取对应的hookedMethodHandler。
mHookHandles是IActivityManagerHookHandle类的实例，IActivityManagerHookHandle：
public class IActivityManagerHookHandle extends BaseHookHandle {
@Override
protected void init() {
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("startActivity", new startActivity(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("startActivityAsUser", new startActivityAsUser(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("startActivityAsCaller", new startActivityAsCaller(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("startActivityAndWait", new startActivityAndWait(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("startActivityWithConfig", new startActivityWithConfig(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("startActivityIntentSender", new startActivityIntentSender(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("startVoiceActivity", new startVoiceActivity(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("startNextMatchingActivity", new startNextMatchingActivity(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("startActivityFromRecents", new startActivityFromRecents(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("finishActivity", new finishActivity(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("registerReceiver", new registerReceiver(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("broadcastIntent", new broadcastIntent(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("unbroadcastIntent", new unbroadcastIntent(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getCallingPackage", new getCallingPackage(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getCallingActivity", new getCallingActivity(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getAppTasks", new getAppTasks(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("addAppTask", new addAppTask(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getTasks", new getTasks(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getServices", new getServices(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getProcessesInErrorState", new getProcessesInErrorState(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getContentProvider", new getContentProvider(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getContentProviderExternal", new getContentProviderExternal(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("removeContentProviderExternal", new removeContentProviderExternal(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("publishContentProviders", new publishContentProviders(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getRunningServiceControlPanel", new getRunningServiceControlPanel(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("startService", new startService(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("stopService", new stopService(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("stopServiceToken", new stopServiceToken(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("setServiceForeground", new setServiceForeground(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("bindService", new bindService(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("publishService", new publishService(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("unbindFinished", new unbindFinished(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("peekService", new peekService(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("bindBackupAgent", new bindBackupAgent(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("backupAgentCreated", new backupAgentCreated(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("unbindBackupAgent", new unbindBackupAgent(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("killApplicationProcess", new killApplicationProcess(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("startInstrumentation", new startInstrumentation(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getActivityClassForToken", new getActivityClassForToken(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getPackageForToken", new getPackageForToken(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getIntentSender", new getIntentSender(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("clearApplicationUserData", new clearApplicationUserData(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("handleIncomingUser", new handleIncomingUser(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("grantUriPermission", new grantUriPermission(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getPersistedUriPermissions", new getPersistedUriPermissions(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("killBackgroundProcesses", new killBackgroundProcesses(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("forceStopPackage", new forceStopPackage(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getRunningAppProcesses", new getRunningAppProcesses(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getRunningExternalApplications", new getRunningExternalApplications(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getMyMemoryState", new getMyMemoryState(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("crashApplication", new crashApplication(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("grantUriPermissionFromOwner", new grantUriPermissionFromOwner(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("checkGrantUriPermission", new checkGrantUriPermission(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("startActivities", new startActivities(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getPackageScreenCompatMode", new getPackageScreenCompatMode(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("setPackageScreenCompatMode", new setPackageScreenCompatMode(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("getPackageAskScreenCompat", new getPackageAskScreenCompat(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("setPackageAskScreenCompat", new setPackageAskScreenCompat(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("navigateUpTo", new navigateUpTo(mHostContext));
sHookedMethodHandlers.put("serviceDoneExecuting", new serviceDoneExecuting(mHostContext));
}
}
在init方法中生成很多类，去hook不同的方法。
拿到HookedMethodHandler之后，执行它的doInnerHook方法：
public synchronized Object doHookInner(Object receiver, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable {
long b = System.currentTimeMillis();
try {
mUseFakedResult = false;
mFakedResult = null;
boolean suc = beforeInvoke(receiver, method, args);
Object invokeResult = null;
if (!suc) {
invokeResult = method.invoke(receiver, args);
}
afterInvoke(receiver, method, args, invokeResult);
if (mUseFakedResult) {
return mFakedResult;
} else {
return invokeResult;
}
} finally {
long time = System.currentTimeMillis() - b;
if (time > 5) {
Log.i(TAG, "doHookInner method(%s.%s) cost %s ms", method.getDeclaringClass().getName(), method.getName(), time);
}
}
}
beforeInvoke
@Override
protected boolean beforeInvoke(Object receiver, Method method, Object[] args) throws Throwable {
RunningActivities.beforeStartActivity();
boolean bRet;
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT < Build.VERSION_CODES.JELLY_BEAN_MR2) {
bRet = doReplaceIntentForStartActivityAPILow(args);
} else {
bRet = doReplaceIntentForStartActivityAPIHigh(args);
}
if (!bRet) {
setFakedResult(Activity.RESULT_CANCELED);
return true;
}
return super.beforeInvoke(receiver, method, args);
}
doReplaceIntentForStartActivityAPIHigh：
protected boolean doReplaceIntentForStartActivityAPIHigh(Object[] args) throws RemoteException {
int intentOfArgIndex = findFirstIntentIndexInArgs(args);
if (args != null && args.length > 1 && intentOfArgIndex >= 0) {
Intent intent = (Intent) args[intentOfArgIndex];
//XXX String callingPackage = (String) args[1];
if (!PluginPatchManager.getInstance().canStartPluginActivity(intent)) {
PluginPatchManager.getInstance().startPluginActivity(intent);
return false;
}
ActivityInfo activityInfo = resolveActivity(intent);
if (activityInfo != null && isPackagePlugin(activityInfo.packageName)) {
ComponentName component = selectProxyActivity(intent);
if (component != null) {
Intent newIntent = new Intent();
try {
ClassLoader pluginClassLoader = PluginProcessManager.getPluginClassLoader(component.getPackageName());
setIntentClassLoader(newIntent, pluginClassLoader);
} catch (Exception e) {
Log.w(TAG, "Set Class Loader to new Intent fail", e);
}
newIntent.setComponent(component);
newIntent.putExtra(Env.EXTRA_TARGET_INTENT, intent);
newIntent.setFlags(intent.getFlags());
String callingPackage = (String) args[1];
if (TextUtils.equals(mHostContext.getPackageName(), callingPackage)) {
newIntent.addFlags(Intent.FLAG_ACTIVITY_NEW_TASK);
args[intentOfArgIndex] = newIntent;
args[1] = mHostContext.getPackageName();
} else {
Log.w(TAG, "startActivity,replace selectProxyActivity fail");
}
}
}
return true;
}
该方法就是生成一个占坑的Intent，把真正的activity当作参数放在Intent中。然后在hook掉AMS通过权限验证
DroidPlugin是将activity替换回来过程
在ActivityThread中最后是通过handler来发送一个消息来通过Instrumentation创建一个Activity的
Handler dispatchMessage：
public void dispatchMessage(Message msg) {
if (msg.callback != null) {
handleCallback(msg);
} else {
if (mCallback != null) {
if (mCallback.handleMessage(msg)) {
return;
}
}
handleMessage(msg);
}
}
在handler内有一个变量mCallback，若mCallback不为null,则使用它去处理message.DroidPlugin自己生成了一个CallBack，并通过反射注入到了ActivityThread的H类中。
然后通过自己的handleLaunchActivity方法来生成一个新的activity：
private boolean handleLaunchActivity(Message msg) {
try {
Object obj = msg.obj;
Intent stubIntent = (Intent) FieldUtils.readField(obj, "intent");
//ActivityInfo activityInfo = (ActivityInfo) FieldUtils.readField(obj, "activityInfo", true);
stubIntent.setExtrasClassLoader(mHostContext.getClassLoader());
Intent targetIntent = stubIntent.getParcelableExtra(Env.EXTRA_TARGET_INTENT);
// 这里多加一个isNotShortcutProxyActivity的判断，因为ShortcutProxyActivity的很特殊，启动它的时候，
// 也会带上一个EXTRA_TARGET_INTENT的数据，就会导致这里误以为是启动插件Activity，所以这里要先做一个判断。
// 之前ShortcutProxyActivity错误复用了key，但是为了兼容，所以这里就先这么判断吧。
if (targetIntent != null && !isShortcutProxyActivity(stubIntent)) {
IPackageManagerHook.fixContextPackageManager(mHostContext);
ComponentName targetComponentName = targetIntent.resolveActivity(mHostContext.getPackageManager());
ActivityInfo targetActivityInfo = PluginManager.getInstance().getActivityInfo(targetComponentName, 0);
if (targetActivityInfo != null) {
if (targetComponentName != null && targetComponentName.getClassName().startsWith(".")) {
targetIntent.setClassName(targetComponentName.getPackageName(), targetComponentName.getPackageName() + targetComponentName.getClassName());
}
ResolveInfo resolveInfo = mHostContext.getPackageManager().resolveActivity(stubIntent, 0);
ActivityInfo stubActivityInfo = resolveInfo != null ? resolveInfo.activityInfo : null;
if (stubActivityInfo != null) {
PluginManager.getInstance().reportMyProcessName(stubActivityInfo.processName, targetActivityInfo.processName, targetActivityInfo.packageName);
}
PluginProcessManager.preLoadApk(mHostContext, targetActivityInfo);
ClassLoader pluginClassLoader = PluginProcessManager.getPluginClassLoader(targetComponentName.getPackageName());
setIntentClassLoader(targetIntent, pluginClassLoader);
setIntentClassLoader(stubIntent, pluginClassLoader);
boolean success = false;
try {
targetIntent.putExtra(Env.EXTRA_TARGET_INFO, targetActivityInfo);
if (stubActivityInfo != null) {
targetIntent.putExtra(Env.EXTRA_STUB_INFO, stubActivityInfo);
}
success = true;
} catch (Exception e) {
Log.e(TAG, "putExtra 1 fail", e);
}
if (!success && Build.VERSION.SDK_INT <= Build.VERSION_CODES.KITKAT) {
try {
ClassLoader oldParent = fixedClassLoader(pluginClassLoader);
targetIntent.putExtras(targetIntent.getExtras());
targetIntent.putExtra(Env.EXTRA_TARGET_INFO, targetActivityInfo);
if (stubActivityInfo != null) {
targetIntent.putExtra(Env.EXTRA_STUB_INFO, stubActivityInfo);
}
fixedClassLoader(oldParent);
success = true;
} catch (Exception e) {
Log.e(TAG, "putExtra 2 fail", e);
}
}
if (!success) {
Intent newTargetIntent = new Intent();
newTargetIntent.setComponent(targetIntent.getComponent());
newTargetIntent.putExtra(Env.EXTRA_TARGET_INFO, targetActivityInfo);
if (stubActivityInfo != null) {
newTargetIntent.putExtra(Env.EXTRA_STUB_INFO, stubActivityInfo);
}
FieldUtils.writeDeclaredField(msg.obj, "intent", newTargetIntent);
} else {
FieldUtils.writeDeclaredField(msg.obj, "intent", targetIntent);
}
FieldUtils.writeDeclaredField(msg.obj, "activityInfo", targetActivityInfo);
Log.i(TAG, "handleLaunchActivity OK");
} else {
Log.e(TAG, "handleLaunchActivity oldInfo==null");
}
} else {
Log.e(TAG, "handleLaunchActivity targetIntent==null");
}
} catch (Exception e) {
Log.e(TAG, "handleLaunchActivity FAIL", e);
}
if (mCallback != null) {
return mCallback.handleMessage(msg);
} else {
return false;
}
}
两种方式的比较
两种方式个有优劣， DroidPlugin的方法更加复杂，但是也更加高级点。还可以hook service,broadcast等操作，而smail只hook了Instrumentation，只能影响activity。
然而在现实开发app中，几乎也不需要动态注册service等组件，所以hook Instrumentation可以应付绝大部分需求了。
